1988
DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(88)90071-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UPTF test results: First three separate effect tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This agrees well with the conclusions of the experiments in the UPTF facility [17,18] in Germany, where no flow choking was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This agrees well with the conclusions of the experiments in the UPTF facility [17,18] in Germany, where no flow choking was observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The working fluid is water with a bulk temperature of 300 K at atmospheric pressure, a condition that can occur during the LBLOCA. The wall temperature range is shown in Table 11, assuming that the single-phase mixed convection correlations are applied where the wall temperature is lower than 373 K. The characteristic length D h is chosen with reference to the UPTF experiment [52]: a 1 : 1 representation of a PWR primary system. Table 11 shows the Grashof number ranges calculated from ΔT obtained by random sampling.…”
Section: Correlation Applicability To Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, no detailed measurement data were available. Therefore only a qualitative comparison of the flow behavior and temperature distribution of the experiment [5] and the CFD calculation was performed.…”
Section: Uptf Test Imentioning
confidence: 99%