2010
DOI: 10.1357/002224010793079004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upwelling limitation by onshore geostrophic flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
126
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
126
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that compensation of coastal upwelling by cross-shore geostrophic currents is an important process, which needs to be taken into account [Colas et al, 2008;Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010]. In all of our simulations, the onshore geostrophic velocity plays an important role all year round and compensates up to one third of the Ekman transport ( Figure 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Our results show that compensation of coastal upwelling by cross-shore geostrophic currents is an important process, which needs to be taken into account [Colas et al, 2008;Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010]. In all of our simulations, the onshore geostrophic velocity plays an important role all year round and compensates up to one third of the Ekman transport ( Figure 11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Currently, there is no generalized conceptual model for the upwelling structure that considers the region near the coast, the coastal boundary and the open ocean (Mellor, 1986;Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010). Traditionally a simple relationship based on wind stress along the coast has been used as an index of the coastal upwelling intensity (Bakun, 1973); this approximation does not consider other more complex physical processes, such as the wind curl (Pickett and Paduan, 2003;Capet et al, 2004;Jacox and Edwards, 2012) and the geostrophic flow toward the coast, which is in balance with the alongshore pressure gradient and could potentially limit upwelling Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there is no generalized conceptual model for the upwelling structure that considers the region near the coast, the coastal boundary and the open ocean (Mellor, 1986;Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010). Traditionally a simple relationship based on wind stress along the coast has been used as an index of the coastal upwelling intensity (Bakun, 1973); this approximation does not consider other more complex physical processes, such as the wind curl (Pickett and Paduan, 2003;Capet et al, 2004;Jacox and Edwards, 2012) and the geostrophic flow toward the coast, which is in balance with the alongshore pressure gradient and could potentially limit upwelling Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010). In the case of the wind curl, several modeling studies from different upwelling systems suggest that wind stress decreases within a narrow coastal band of 10-80 km called wind "drop-off" (Capet et al, 2004;Bane et al, 2005;Perlin et al, 2007;Renault et al, 2012Renault et al, , 2015 that is highly sensitive to the resolution of the model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-shelf circulation over the nearshore region plays a key role on the distribution of plankton, nutrients, heat, salt and sediments, and has been the subject of many recent studies Lentz et al, 2008;Hendrickson and MacMahan, 2009;Marchesiello and Estrade, 2010;Ganju et al, 2011;Lentz and Fewings, 2012;Liu and Gan, 2014). Wind-driven upwelling and downwelling systems are particularly important because of the cross-shelf exchange that is forced in these wind conditions, which promotes transport of material across the shelf, especially over stratified shelves (Austin and Lentz, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%