2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium (238U)-induced ROS and cell cycle perturbations, antioxidant responses and erythrocyte nuclear abnormalities in the freshwater iridescent shark fish Pangasius sutchi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cells exposed to uranium could generate many reactive oxygen species (ROS), which eventually leads to cell inactivation and even necrosis. The considerably increased ROS may be to scavenge the overproduction of superoxide anions under oxidative stress induced by 238 U accumulation . Therefore, an assay was designed to measure the ROS levels of the cells treated with or without COS-HOPO.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cells exposed to uranium could generate many reactive oxygen species (ROS), which eventually leads to cell inactivation and even necrosis. The considerably increased ROS may be to scavenge the overproduction of superoxide anions under oxidative stress induced by 238 U accumulation . Therefore, an assay was designed to measure the ROS levels of the cells treated with or without COS-HOPO.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considerably increased ROS may be to scavenge the overproduction of superoxide anions under oxidative stress induced by 238 U accumulation. 54 Therefore, an assay was designed to measure the ROS levels of the cells treated with or without COS-HOPO. As shown in Figure 2C, the level of intracellular ROS in the group treated with UO 2 2+ dramatically increased 2-fold compared with the mock group, whereas the U(VI)-induced ROS production decreased by 35.8% in the group cotreated with 50 μg/mL COS-HOPO and 49.6 μM uranium U(VI), and 23.7% in the group cotreated with ZnNa 3 -DTPA and 49.6 μM uranium U(VI) compared with the group treated with solely UO 2 2+ .…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The internal contamination of uranium in cells results in the increased activities of lipid peroxidase (LPO) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) and the decreased activity of catalase (CAT), indicating the generation of excessive amounts of superoxide radicals (˙O 2 − ) as reported. 10 The reduction of superoxide radicals to H 2 O 2 was further enhanced by the catalysis of SOD. 10 H 2 O 2 is well-known as a member of the ROS family, and supraphysiological concentrations of H 2 O 2 (>100 nM) will lead to damage to biomolecules due to the generation of hydroxyl radicals (˙OH), 27 the strongest ROS species in vivo , via the Fenton reaction of H 2 O 2 and Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And the case is even worse when exposed to highly radioactive uranium isotopes such as U-233 and U-230. 10 Hence, the efficient and targeted removal of uranium and excess ROS in the accumulation sites is the most crucial in treating uranium-contaminated individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, our model concluded that there was a significant offset in cell number and PDs over the entire growth curve. It is hypothesized that the delay in mitosis may be attributed to U being able to keep cells locked in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, as demonstrated in at least one in vivo model [ 47 ]. An alternative hypothesis is that the delay in proliferation is once again a product of elevated necrosis or apoptosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%