2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jb022279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Basin Structure Imaging Based on Dense Arrays and Bayesian Array‐Based Coherent Receiver Functions

Abstract:  We developed a novel Bayesian array-based receiver function method that can leverage dense arrays for urban basin imaging;  Probabilistic representation of the receiver functions helps objective assessment of feature identification and geological interpretation;  Our method produces reliable and coherent basin images that can improve our understanding of subsurface structures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
47
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the deployment of dense seismic arrays makes it possible to resolve the fine-scale velocity structure of the top 5 km sedimentary layer (Castellanos and Clayton, 2021;Jia and Clayton, 2021;Lin et al, 2013). In addition to the ambient noise correlation, receiver functions are also evaluated from the dense array datasets to constrain the basement depth within the sedimentary basins Liu et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2021). Receiver function using our linear dense arrays has shown a coherent converted phase at the basin bottom can be observed in the SG and SB area, which provide an independent constraint on the basin structure in this area (Liu et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the deployment of dense seismic arrays makes it possible to resolve the fine-scale velocity structure of the top 5 km sedimentary layer (Castellanos and Clayton, 2021;Jia and Clayton, 2021;Lin et al, 2013). In addition to the ambient noise correlation, receiver functions are also evaluated from the dense array datasets to constrain the basement depth within the sedimentary basins Liu et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2021). Receiver function using our linear dense arrays has shown a coherent converted phase at the basin bottom can be observed in the SG and SB area, which provide an independent constraint on the basin structure in this area (Liu et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-resolution images of shallow structures could help the planning of buildings and the utilization of underground space, the simulation of ground motions (Bonnefoy-Claudet et al 2006), and the identification of sinkholes (Tran et al 2013), which are of great significance for city development. Seismological methods have been widely used for imaging and monitoring the subsurface by its high precision (Ma and Qian 2020), and remarkable results have been achieved (e.g., Foti et al 2011;Krawczyk et al 2012;Nakata et al 2011, 2015, Bora et al 2020Wang et al 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, passive methods with nodal arrays can resolve the structure of sedimentary basins in urban environments, where conventional active source seismic techniques are too obtrusive. Nodal arrays and passive imaging techniques such as interferometry (Castellanos & Clayton, 2021) and receiver functions (X. Wang et al., 2021) provide an alternative path to characterizing seismic hazard at high resolution.…”
Section: Science Enabled By Big Data Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of active source surveys in urban settings is costly, intrusive, and logistically challenging. The analysis of data from the Long Beach array, and additional Large‐N nodal arrays deployed in the Los Angeles area, have utilized passive techniques including ambient noise interferometry of surface waves (Jia & Clayton, 2021; Lin et al., 2013), body waves (Nakata et al., 2015), and receiver functions (X. Wang et al., 2021) to reconstruct high‐resolution 3D velocity models from the surface to depths of a few kilometers. High‐resolution velocity models can provide important constraints for earthquake hazard assessment, which relies on models of peak ground acceleration (Castellanos & Clayton, 2021), a property that is very sensitive to crustal properties and can vary spatially across multiple scales.…”
Section: Science Enabled By Big Data Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%