2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban colonization through multiple genetic lenses: The city‐fox phenomenon revisited

Abstract: Urbanization is driving environmental change on a global scale, creating novel environments for wildlife to colonize. Through a combination of stochastic and selective processes, urbanization is also driving evolutionary change. For instance, difficulty in traversing human‐modified landscapes may isolate newly established populations from rural sources, while novel selective pressures, such as altered disease risk, toxicant exposure, and light pollution, may further diverge populations through local adaptation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(173 reference statements)
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a founder effect may have created an initial reduction in genetic diversity among urban foxes, impermeable border fortifications could have limited gene flow and thus artificially maintained genetic differentiation between urban and rural foxes. However, genetic exchange between urban and rural foxes must also have remained sufficiently low in the ensuing 30 years to maintain genetic structure (with generation time being 2–3 years, DeCandia et al, ). Based on F ST values ( F ST ≥ 0.027), Wandeler et al () detected genetic differentiation between urban and rural foxes for the then recently (15 years) established fox population within Zurich.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While a founder effect may have created an initial reduction in genetic diversity among urban foxes, impermeable border fortifications could have limited gene flow and thus artificially maintained genetic differentiation between urban and rural foxes. However, genetic exchange between urban and rural foxes must also have remained sufficiently low in the ensuing 30 years to maintain genetic structure (with generation time being 2–3 years, DeCandia et al, ). Based on F ST values ( F ST ≥ 0.027), Wandeler et al () detected genetic differentiation between urban and rural foxes for the then recently (15 years) established fox population within Zurich.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, assignment tests provided evidence for ongoing urban‐rural gene flow. A recent re‐analysis of the same data set identified only one evolutionary cluster (DeCandia et al, ). Further research in other metropolitan areas might help to clarify whether the urban island is a general phenomenon or a specificity of Berlin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of the identified candidate genes have functions related to the metabolism and transport of lipids and carbohydrates, suggesting that selection acts on metabolic pathways in mice due to their novel diets in cities (Harris and Munshi-South 2017). Similar studies in other species indicate positive selection on candidate genes linked to various functions that may be involved in urban adaptations, including metabolism, detoxification, oxidative stress, heat tolerance, immunity, morphology, and behaviour (Reid et al 2016;Ravinet et al 2018;Theodorou et al 2018;DeCandia et al 2019).…”
Section: Genetic Changesmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Demographic bottlenecks and population separations may lead to a decrease of genetic diversity [77]. This may limit the adaptive potential of populations to pathogens [78, 79] and, in turn, influence disease dynamics and increase vulnerability to diseases [80, 81]. The fox population collapse (already denominated as “rabies pit” [56]) in the Plateau and the Jura may have impaired, on the one hand, the transmission of S. scabiei due to the reduced density and therefore contacts among foxes and, on the other hand, removed diseased and also resistant individuals, disrupting the long-term host-parasite adaptation and generating a susceptible “naïve-like” population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%