2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban green and blue: Who values what and where?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the land take-related covariates can be non-stationary. The most suitable approach to deal with non-stationary explanatory variables is represented by geographically-weighted regressions (GWRs) [64], which are based on the implementation of as many regression models as the records concerning land take. This implies as many regressions as the number of municipalities, whose estimates are based on the observations belonging to neighborhoods defined through an optimal bandwidth centered in every municipality.…”
Section: The Outcomes Of the Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the land take-related covariates can be non-stationary. The most suitable approach to deal with non-stationary explanatory variables is represented by geographically-weighted regressions (GWRs) [64], which are based on the implementation of as many regression models as the records concerning land take. This implies as many regressions as the number of municipalities, whose estimates are based on the observations belonging to neighborhoods defined through an optimal bandwidth centered in every municipality.…”
Section: The Outcomes Of the Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal bandwidth is calculated by means of a fixed kernel function, or by means of an ad hoc kernel function based on the Akaike algorithm [65], or through an algorithm related to the minimization of the residuals sum of squares [66]. The optimal bandwidths identified through Akaike's or Fotheringham's algorithms are equal-sized sets of observations [64,67]. In the case of our dataset, we do not have any prior hypotheses concerning the size of the optimal neighborhood (bandwidth); on the other hand, the implementation of Akaike's and of Fotheringham's algorithms identifies large local sets of observations (close to three quarters) and the resulting estimates of the coefficients of the covariates are very similar to one another and to the global regression model.…”
Section: The Outcomes Of the Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From an analysis of the literature, three main categories of variable can be identified: structural, environmental and territorial variables [32]. The first set of variables consists of all the variables that characterize the structural aspects of properties.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brisbane home-buyers may be signalling their support for desirable features such as shadier and attractive footpaths and more walkable neighbourhoods that come with leafier streets, as suggested by Wachter and Gillen (2006). Leafy streets may further increase in value as tree cover on private property decreases (Sander and Zhao, 2015).…”
Section: Returns On Investmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the Brisbane result was yet another example of the geographic and contextual variations in effects of street trees on property values, and an important caution against inferring results from one city, or even one neighbourhood within a city (Sander and Zhao, 2015), to estimate the property value benefits in another. The "i-Tree Streets" generic property value algorithm is currently based a 1988 study result of the effect of front yard trees on house sale price (Anderson & Cordell, 1988), then used to derive a rate for property value benefits per square metre of street tree canopy, and adjusted only by the number of street trees, their estimated annual growth in leaf area and median property price.…”
Section: Improving the Accuracy Of Property Value Benefit Measures Inmentioning
confidence: 99%