2018
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12300
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban spatial structure in OECD cities: Is urban population decentralising or clustering?

Abstract: This paper presents an analysis of urban spatial structure and its trends in the OECD between 2001 and 2011, by using a standardized definition of functional urban areas (FUAs) in 29 OECD countries. The prevalent trend is an increasing decentralization of the population, with growth taking place outside existing cores, but close to them. Overall, results are consistent with a pattern of contiguous growth. The population has grown more in relatively low‐density locations close to the main centres. Closeness to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…North, Central, and South American countries may, in fact, exhibit differences in those relationships, and the model took such differences into account. Mexico, for example, is still undergoing a rapid urbanization process, and during the last decade it had the highest growth rate of urban population among OECD countries, as well as the largest decline of population outside functional urban areas (Veneri, 2015). …”
Section: Macroregional Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…North, Central, and South American countries may, in fact, exhibit differences in those relationships, and the model took such differences into account. Mexico, for example, is still undergoing a rapid urbanization process, and during the last decade it had the highest growth rate of urban population among OECD countries, as well as the largest decline of population outside functional urban areas (Veneri, 2015). …”
Section: Macroregional Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problematic part is that while maintaining economic development, it is very difficult to reduce additional land consumption [22]. In the OECD countries between 2001 and 2011, the trend of the decentralisation of population prevails in the analysis of mechanical population movements within functional urban areas, with population growth not taking place directly in existing cores but usually in their immediate vicinity, in places with low population densities [23], while such residents do not have to be from the core city, but also from other cities [24,25]. In addition, if there are more municipalities in the immediate background of the city, their spatial interaction in terms of expansion may occur within neighbouring municipalities, as individual municipalities are competing for new inhabitants, thus significantly promoting the growth of the core city [26].…”
Section: Suburbanisation In the Context Of Environmental Aspects And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The moving direction θ i,t is assumed to follow θ i,t~U (0, 2π). As in urban areas there usually exist one or more population centers (Veneri, 2017), we modify Kang and Han (2017) to take this into account. More specifically, to reproduce the negative-exponential pattern of population density identified in urban centers (Muth, 1967), we assume that participants have lower probabilities to move when they are closer to a population center, which is justifiable as people usually stay longer times in the working and entertainment places of the population center:…”
Section: Water Resources Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%