2015
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2015.1072050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urban Traffic Flow Prediction Using a Spatio-Temporal Random Effects Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Convolutional and max-pooling operations of a convolutional neural network using a 3 3 filter (adapted from a deeplearning tutorial [47] ). State-space models, such as the spatiotemporal random effect model [57] , which use a set of inputs, outputs, and state variables to describe a system by a set of first-order differential equations.…”
Section: Deep Learning For Traffic Forecasting 221 Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Convolutional and max-pooling operations of a convolutional neural network using a 3 3 filter (adapted from a deeplearning tutorial [47] ). State-space models, such as the spatiotemporal random effect model [57] , which use a set of inputs, outputs, and state variables to describe a system by a set of first-order differential equations.…”
Section: Deep Learning For Traffic Forecasting 221 Traditional Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, several recent studies discover spatiotemporal relationships on the basis of special methods or indicators, designed by the authors to apply deeper analysis of traffic similarities. Dong et al [7] constructed an indicator that simultaneously includes adjacency of spatial locationsthe shortest distance and number of intersections between them; Zhu et al [30] utilised similarity of traffic flows at different spatial locations; Cheng et al [31] weighted the similarity by the distance between links; Deng and Jiang [32] suggested empirical association rules; Pascale and Nicoli [33] utilised a mutual information indicator; Chan et al [34] applied the Taguchi method; Cai et al [35] constructed an indicator using the distance and a connective grade of spatial locations and correlations for traffic flows; Wu et al [36] suggested a custom bi-square function; Chen et al [37] applied weighted traffic flows as a similarity metric.…”
Section: Class 2: Endogenous Feature Filtering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Lewis' scale of interpretation of estimation accuracy [34], any forecast with a MAPE value of less than 10 % can be considered highly accurate, 11-20 % is good, 21-50 % is reasonable and 51 % or more is inaccurate. In most of the studies on flow prediction [23,24,29,30,35], a MAPE in the range of 10-20 % was reported. Since traffic flow observations vary from a few hundred vehicles per hour in off peak to several thousand vehicles during peak periods, MAPE in the range of 10-20 % is generally acceptable.…”
Section: Corroboration Of the Prediction Schemementioning
confidence: 99%