2006
DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1796:uasefb]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urbanization Affects Stream Ecosystem Function by Altering Hydrology, Chemistry, and Biotic Richness

Abstract: Catchment urbanization can alter physical, chemical, and biological attributes of stream ecosystems. In particular, changes in land use may affect the dynamics of organic matter decomposition, a measure of ecosystem function. We examined leaf-litter decomposition in 18 tributaries of the St. Johns River, Florida, USA. Land use in all 18 catchments ranged from 0% to 93% urban which translated to 0% to 66% total impervious area (TIA). Using a litter-bag technique, we measured mass loss, fungal biomass, and macro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small forest streams are also highly vulnerable to global warming because most of their biota have relatively low upper thermal tolerance limits (de Koz lowski & Bunting 1981, Eaton & Scheller 1996 and will lack thermal refugia if they are already at their high latitude or highland limit. Also, the hetero trophic nature of these small streams and their strong interaction with the terrestrial surroundings (Vannote et al 1980, Mulholland et al 2001) make them most sensitive to changes in the riparian vegetation, which can result from invasion by exotic species, conversion of diverse deciduous forests into tree monocultures or agricultural fields, vegetation re mo val by forestry practices or urban development (Chadwick et al 2006, Ferreira et al 2006b, Lecerf et al 2007, Castela et al 2008. All these threats have been shown to induce changes in the structure of aquatic communities (Bärlocher & Graça 2002, Pascoal et al 2005, Ferreira et al 2006b, Castela et al 2008, Dang et al 2009), which might have profound consequences for the maintenance of ecosystem processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small forest streams are also highly vulnerable to global warming because most of their biota have relatively low upper thermal tolerance limits (de Koz lowski & Bunting 1981, Eaton & Scheller 1996 and will lack thermal refugia if they are already at their high latitude or highland limit. Also, the hetero trophic nature of these small streams and their strong interaction with the terrestrial surroundings (Vannote et al 1980, Mulholland et al 2001) make them most sensitive to changes in the riparian vegetation, which can result from invasion by exotic species, conversion of diverse deciduous forests into tree monocultures or agricultural fields, vegetation re mo val by forestry practices or urban development (Chadwick et al 2006, Ferreira et al 2006b, Lecerf et al 2007, Castela et al 2008. All these threats have been shown to induce changes in the structure of aquatic communities (Bärlocher & Graça 2002, Pascoal et al 2005, Ferreira et al 2006b, Castela et al 2008, Dang et al 2009), which might have profound consequences for the maintenance of ecosystem processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, invertebrates have critical functional roles in headwater stream ecosystems as predators, consumers of primary producers, processors of organic detritus and as prey (Chadwick et al, 2006;Weijters et al, 2009). Therefore, assemblage characteristics are indicative of biological production, nutrient and energy flow pathways and efficiency, and other functional qualities of streams that are frequently degraded by human land use (Chadwick et al, 2006;Weijters et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, assemblage characteristics are indicative of biological production, nutrient and energy flow pathways and efficiency, and other functional qualities of streams that are frequently degraded by human land use (Chadwick et al, 2006;Weijters et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Processing rates of organic matter typically are higher in urban than in forested watersheds because of excess nutrients and stimulated microbial processing (Pascoal et al 2005, Imberger et al 2008) but can decline because of decreases in macroinvertebrate consumers (Chadwick et al 2006). Physical fragmentation associated with higher storm runoff in urban watersheds can increase losses of organic matter to downstream reaches (Paul et al 2006).…”
Section: Drivermentioning
confidence: 99%