2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rsase.2015.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urbanization in European regions based on night lights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A buffer was used to minimize any bias in eBird sampling protocols (e.g., mis-placement of eBird checklists by participants, and to account for travelling checklists throughout an area) and the size of the buffer has no discernible influence on the relative urban-score differences among species (Callaghan et al 2019a). We used the VIIRS night-time lights (Elvidge et al 2017) as a proxy for urbanization because it is correlated positively with impervious surface cover and human population density (Pandey et al 2013, Zhang and Seto 2013, Stathakis et al 2015) and because of its global availability and ease of use with Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al 2017). For each buffer, raw radiance values were used -after filtering of the data to minimize the influence of fires, degraded data and other light source contamination (Elvidge et al 2017) -between 2013-2017 and the average raw radiance value was taken as an annual composite.…”
Section: Species-specific Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A buffer was used to minimize any bias in eBird sampling protocols (e.g., mis-placement of eBird checklists by participants, and to account for travelling checklists throughout an area) and the size of the buffer has no discernible influence on the relative urban-score differences among species (Callaghan et al 2019a). We used the VIIRS night-time lights (Elvidge et al 2017) as a proxy for urbanization because it is correlated positively with impervious surface cover and human population density (Pandey et al 2013, Zhang and Seto 2013, Stathakis et al 2015) and because of its global availability and ease of use with Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al 2017). For each buffer, raw radiance values were used -after filtering of the data to minimize the influence of fires, degraded data and other light source contamination (Elvidge et al 2017) -between 2013-2017 and the average raw radiance value was taken as an annual composite.…”
Section: Species-specific Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remote sensing provides raster data support. Due to the time issue of MODIS data and the classification difficulty of Landsat data, nighttime light remote sensing data have been widely used in urban and regional analysis [16,17]. For example, built-up areas that are extracted from nighttime light data can cover the parks within cities that are ignored by Landsat data [18].…”
Section: Of 24mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mis-placement of eBird checklists by participants, and to account for travelling checklists throughout an area) and the size of the buffer has no discernible influence on the relative urban-score differences among species (Callaghan et al 2019a). We used the VIIRS night-time lights (Elvidge et al 2017) as a proxy for urbanization because it is correlated positively with impervious surface cover and human population density (Pandey et al 2013, Zhang and Seto 2013, Stathakis et al 2015 and because of its global availability and ease of use with Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al 2017). For each buffer, raw radiance values were used -after filtering of the data to minimize the influence of fires, degraded data and other light source contamination (Elvidge et al 2017) -between 2013 and 2017 and the average raw radiance value was taken as an annual composite.…”
Section: Species-specific Scoresmentioning
confidence: 99%