Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualisation (CGIV 2007) 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cgiv.2007.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urdu Spoken Digits Recognition Using Classified MFCC and Backpropgation Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the categorization algorithm with an English language database was also performed. Many works [12,17,22] considered Urdu language voice data for various applications. Hasnain et al in [17] described the frequency analysis of spoken Urdu numbers from 0 to 9.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the categorization algorithm with an English language database was also performed. Many works [12,17,22] considered Urdu language voice data for various applications. Hasnain et al in [17] described the frequency analysis of spoken Urdu numbers from 0 to 9.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, some work studied ASR for Urdu [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Additionally, numerous works [12,17,[21][22][23] have been done on spoken digit recognition for Urdu. The abovementioned works have shown significant results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [11] presents a system for isolated digit recognition in Urdu and [12] uses a multilayer perceptron to recognize Urdu digits from a single speaker. Finally [13] presents an analysis of Urdu digits to be used for Urdu digit recognition.…”
Section: Urdu Speech Recognition Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malay digits has reported a recognition rate of 80.5% and 90.7% when dynamic time warping and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) techniques were used respectively (Al-Haddad et al, 2008), whereas recognition rates of 98% (Azam et al, 2007), 99.5% (Alotaibi, 2005) and 98.125% to 100% (Dede et al, 2010) were reported in a similar application using neural networks.…”
Section: Automatic Speech Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%