2016
DOI: 10.1177/0956462416666482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urethral inflammatory response to ureaplasma is significantly lower than to Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis

Abstract: A non-syndromic approach to treatment of people with non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) requires identification of pathogens and understanding of the role of those pathogens in causing disease. The most commonly detected and isolated micro-organisms in the male urethral tract are bacteria belonging to the family of Mycoplasmataceae, in particular Ureaplasma urealyticum and Ureaplasma parvum. To better understand the role of these Ureaplasma species in NGU, we have performed a prospective analysis of male patients… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
6
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The role of U . urealyticum in male NGU is still not settled, as studies have shown diverging results [5, 6, 36, 37] and the present study did not find any correlation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…The role of U . urealyticum in male NGU is still not settled, as studies have shown diverging results [5, 6, 36, 37] and the present study did not find any correlation.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…N. gonorrhea and C. trachomatis microbes can induce male urethritis or CP, therefore they are eradicated by administering specific antimicrobials [5915]. However, urethral inflammatory response after Ureaplasma infections is significantly lower than that of Mycoplasma genitalium or C. trachomatis [16]. In other words, clinical symptoms or signs such as urethral discharge and increased WBC counts in voided urine samples are usually inconsistent following Ureaplasma infections [9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, 10-20 ml of first void urine was collected. DNA was isolated from 200 μ l of medium from the cervical swab (Roche Molecular system) and from 200 μ l of first void urine (FVU) [ 7 ]. NAAT was performed for each of these microorganisms from FVU, as well as from a cervical/vaginal swab.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%