2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urinary excretion of an intravenous 26Mg dose as an indicator of marginal magnesium deficiency in adults

Abstract: Background: Measurement of magnesium (Mg) status is problematic because tissue Mg deficiency can be present without low serum Mg concentrations. Objective: To evaluate a modified version of the Mg retention test using stable isotopes for the assessment of Mg status in general, and the detection of marginal Mg deficiency in particular. Design: A modified version of the Mg retention test using a small dose of 26 Mg was evaluated for assessment of Mg status in 22 healthy subjects. Muscle Mg concentration was used… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within 24 hours only 7·9 % of the injected dose was excreted in the urine and the fraction excreted correlated with total urinary Mg excretion. In contrast to other loading tests, this dose was apparently insufficient to modify the size of the pools in subjects with marginal deficiency as defined by a range of Mg muscle concentrations from 3·50 to 4·19 mmol/100 g fat free dried solids ( 113 ) . Using double labelled Mg in healthy adult men, 26 Mg given orally and 25 Mg injected intravenously, blood, urine and faeces were collected for 12 days to build a compartmental model of Mg kinetics.…”
Section: Isotope Balance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Within 24 hours only 7·9 % of the injected dose was excreted in the urine and the fraction excreted correlated with total urinary Mg excretion. In contrast to other loading tests, this dose was apparently insufficient to modify the size of the pools in subjects with marginal deficiency as defined by a range of Mg muscle concentrations from 3·50 to 4·19 mmol/100 g fat free dried solids ( 113 ) . Using double labelled Mg in healthy adult men, 26 Mg given orally and 25 Mg injected intravenously, blood, urine and faeces were collected for 12 days to build a compartmental model of Mg kinetics.…”
Section: Isotope Balance Studiesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A more complicated method of determining magnesium status relies on intravenous magnesium loading followed by a 24 h urine collection, ostensibly to measure what percentage of administered dose is retained, from which an assessment of magnesium status can be derived. This retention test relies heavily on the reliability and standardization of the 24 h urine measurement, which is not uniformly accepted [ 125 , 189 , 190 , 191 , 192 , 193 ]. Additionally, this test is costly, more suitable for research units and impractical for most clinical settings.…”
Section: Analytical Challenges In Establishing Magnesium Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pre-and posttesting period of time, we obtained a percutaneous biopsy after local anesthesia with 1 % lidocaine from the middle portion of the nondominant vastus lateralis muscle, using a ProMag Ultra device and 14 gauge needles (Angiotech Pharmaceuticals, Gainesville, FL, USA), as previously described [28] . After removal, the muscle tissue was immediately mounted in an embedding medium (Tissue-Tek ® , Sakura, Zoeterwoude, The Netherlands), snap frozen in isopentane cooled to − 160 ° C with liquid nitrogen, and subsequently stored at − 80 ° C until use.…”
Section: Experimental Procedures Muscle Biopsy Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%