1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(98)00195-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Urine spraying in cats: presence of concurrent disease and effects of a pheromone treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

7
74
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
7
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with findings in previous reports [4,8,12,15], in which researchers defined the success rate as the ratio of the animals whose markings at the last week of treatment were reduced compared to their markings at the preW. The success rate among our subjects calculated by this method was 91.6% (33/36 animals), which is higher than the 74% success rate found in a USA study [4] but similar to that of 97% found in a French study [12] and that of 91% found in a UK study 5 Siamese 36 2 1 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 0 + Unchanged 34 Spayed female Multi 8 DSH 72 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Unchanged 35 Spayed female Multi 3 DSH 7 3 17 14 10 7 7 3 4 4 3 Better 36 Spayed female Single 11 DSH 62 1 22 0 0 0 0 3 7 [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This result is consistent with findings in previous reports [4,8,12,15], in which researchers defined the success rate as the ratio of the animals whose markings at the last week of treatment were reduced compared to their markings at the preW. The success rate among our subjects calculated by this method was 91.6% (33/36 animals), which is higher than the 74% success rate found in a USA study [4] but similar to that of 97% found in a French study [12] and that of 91% found in a UK study 5 Siamese 36 2 1 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 0 + Unchanged 34 Spayed female Multi 8 DSH 72 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Unchanged 35 Spayed female Multi 3 DSH 7 3 17 14 10 7 7 3 4 4 3 Better 36 Spayed female Single 11 DSH 62 1 22 0 0 0 0 3 7 [15].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This result is consistent with findings in previous reports [4,8,12,15], in which researchers defined the success rate as the ratio of the animals whose markings at the last week of treatment were reduced compared to their markings at the preW. The success rate among our subjects calculated by this method was 91.6% (33/36 animals), which is higher than the 74% success rate found in a USA study [4] but similar to that of 97% found in a French study [12] and that of 91% found in a UK study 5 Siamese 36 2 1 0 2 1 2 3 1 0 0 + Unchanged 34 Spayed female Multi 8 DSH 72 4 3 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 Unchanged 35 Spayed female Multi 3 DSH 7 3 17 14 10 7 7 3 4 4 3 Better 36 Spayed female Single 11 DSH 62 1 22 0 0 0 0 3 7 [15]. The differences in findings among these studies, in which the experimental designs were very similar, might be caused not only by regional differences but by differences among environmental conditions such as the total number of cats in a household, or various differences in the animals' backgrounds relative to such factors as age, duration of the problem, and/or the presence of other behavioral problems.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations