2020
DOI: 10.2196/16310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability of a Mobile App for Improving Literacy in Children With Hearing Impairment: Focus Group Study

Abstract: Background Children with hearing loss, even those identified early and who use hearing aids or cochlear implants, may face challenges in developing spoken language and literacy. This can lead to academic, behavioral, and social difficulties. There are apps for healthy children to improve their spoken language and literacy and apps that focus on sign language proficiency for children with hearing loss, but these apps are limited for children with hearing loss. Therefore, we have developed an app cal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One limitation of this study was the time delay between the heuristic evaluations and the focus group meeting. Previous studies have conducted focus group meetings immediately after participants interacted with an app's interface (DeForte et al, 2020). Due to conflicting schedules of participants, the focus group meeting was held as far as five days after some participants' initial interaction with FIND's interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One limitation of this study was the time delay between the heuristic evaluations and the focus group meeting. Previous studies have conducted focus group meetings immediately after participants interacted with an app's interface (DeForte et al, 2020). Due to conflicting schedules of participants, the focus group meeting was held as far as five days after some participants' initial interaction with FIND's interface.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usability and acceptance of the app will be measured using scientific methods. Our team has an extensive track record in acceptability and usability testing [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]. We will be employing a user-centered, participatory design and testing methodology, and widely adopted usability and acceptance scales, such as the system usability scale (SUS) and the technology acceptance model (TAM) [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows the characteristics of the included literature. A large proportion of the sources reported different types of apps that can be used on smart-phones and tablets [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. The other sources included a smart shower [43], conversational agents [44], gaming, social media, and robotics technologies [45], website [46], interactive map [47], augmented reality magnification aid device for low vision user [48], electric powered wheelchair [49] and strategies for how to design digital health solutions [50][51][52].…”
Section: Characteristics Of Included Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of several of the included sources have designed and developed digital health solutions intended for people with impairments and invited people with impairments to test the usability of the solution and service [28,29,34,37]. In accordance with the sources presented above, the testers reported varying degrees of challenges related to the layout and navigation of the apps, indicating that it is challenging to design a userfriendly app.…”
Section: The Needs and Barriers Related To The Use Of Digital Health ...mentioning
confidence: 99%