2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2011.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability Testing for e-Resource Discovery: How Students Find and Choose e-Resources Using Library Web Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Amy Fry and Linda Rich (2011) found that students can have difficulty choosing which databases to use for a search. Students they observed often did not properly use subject guides and database lists (if they used them at all).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Amy Fry and Linda Rich (2011) found that students can have difficulty choosing which databases to use for a search. Students they observed often did not properly use subject guides and database lists (if they used them at all).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have included case studies of implementing a site design or feature (Ganster and Schumacher 2009;Moore and Greene 2012), as well as usability testing of specific components, such as catalog systems (Emanuel 2011) and discovery tools (Majors 2012), or lists of electronic resources (Fry and Rich 2011).…”
Section: Library Home Page Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usage patterns are also closely tied to brand recognition and familiarity. Users tend to click on what they recognize and what they have used before, even if there are more relevant resources at their disposal (Fry & Rich, 2011). These factors can disrupt usage, but a higher CPU might not fully capture the resource's holistic value and potential to meet the needs of the library's community in the future.…”
Section: Strategic Application Of Multivariable Rubricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the behavior and characteristic of today's researchers (or students) in an academic setting evolves, the word -collaboration, sharing, mobility, access and ubiquity starts to change and influence in the activities cycle of research workflow (Flynn, Gilchrist, & Olson, 2004;Fry & Rich, 2011;Wendling & Johnson, 2008). Tools, such as Endnote and RefWorks, have to go beyond than the original functionally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%