1987
DOI: 10.1001/jama.1987.03400200217029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use and Interpretation of Diagnostic Immunologic Laboratory Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1990
1990
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consensus of the group was that they could sustain a 25% increment of training volume throughout the 3 weeks. In fact, the activity questionnaires showed that the weekly distance had been increased 4564 (996) 38 (24) by 35%, and since most subjects also had some increase of speed over the same route, the estimated training volume was increased by an average of 38% On average, the heavy training did not lead to any gains of maximal aerobic power (Table 2). In all except three subjects, the difference of maximal oxygen intake between the two visits was less than 5%.…”
Section: Modification Of Training Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consensus of the group was that they could sustain a 25% increment of training volume throughout the 3 weeks. In fact, the activity questionnaires showed that the weekly distance had been increased 4564 (996) 38 (24) by 35%, and since most subjects also had some increase of speed over the same route, the estimated training volume was increased by an average of 38% On average, the heavy training did not lead to any gains of maximal aerobic power (Table 2). In all except three subjects, the difference of maximal oxygen intake between the two visits was less than 5%.…”
Section: Modification Of Training Planmentioning
confidence: 99%