2017
DOI: 10.1002/ca.23025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use and perceptions of plastination among medical anatomy educators in the United States

Abstract: Traditionally, medical schools have maintained collections of tissues/organs to engage students in anatomy. Such collections are often stored in volatile and toxic preservatives. Plastination is an alternative tissue preservation technique in which polymers replace water and lipids resulting in benign, dry, and anatomically authentic specimens. Plastination is used in medical education internationally; however, its use within U.S. medical schools is not widely discussed in the anatomical literature. This study… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When used for educational purpose, the plastinates can be accessed at any time and allow the easy transportation of specimens to distant teaching sites outside the dissection hall without the need for carrying them in preservative laden containers (Rahul et al, 2020). Plastination likewise enables the students, academics and researchers to study an organ or tissue without being obliged by an actual division among himself and the specimen, that is, a container or gloves (Latorre et al, 2016;Klaus et al;Rahul et al). In the present study, we analyzed the histomorphology and biometry of different organs i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When used for educational purpose, the plastinates can be accessed at any time and allow the easy transportation of specimens to distant teaching sites outside the dissection hall without the need for carrying them in preservative laden containers (Rahul et al, 2020). Plastination likewise enables the students, academics and researchers to study an organ or tissue without being obliged by an actual division among himself and the specimen, that is, a container or gloves (Latorre et al, 2016;Klaus et al;Rahul et al). In the present study, we analyzed the histomorphology and biometry of different organs i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the findings of Klaus et al (2017), plastinates at present don't permit further analyzation or histology based studies which forestalls its utilization for research purposes. Plastinated specimens embedded in paraffin cannot always be used for microscopy because of artifacts produced during cutting (Grondin et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is done by converting the tissue into a durable plastic model by a process, which replaces the water in it with a polymer (mostly silicon). Even though the process is time consuming, it is beneficial, especially in preserving rare specimens since the plastic models or "plastinates" last forever without the need for preservative (von Hagens, 1986;Klaus et al, 2018). It is valued as a safe and inexpensive alternative to formalin as a long-term preservative and has been previously elucidated in the literature (Ravi and Bhat, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastinates at present do not allow further dissection or histologybased studies. This prevents its use for research purposes, especially in the case of rare specimens (Klaus et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plastination specimens did not completely replace the traditional guided animal dissection; similar result was mentioned by Klaus et al (2018). Moreover, the combination of the plastinated specimens with the traditional wet specimens in the teaching and learning of veterinary gross anatomy can be beneficial depending on the topic being taught at the time; similar result was mentioned by Latorre et al (2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%