Traditionally, medical schools have maintained collections of tissues/organs to engage students in anatomy. Such collections are often stored in volatile and toxic preservatives. Plastination is an alternative tissue preservation technique in which polymers replace water and lipids resulting in benign, dry, and anatomically authentic specimens. Plastination is used in medical education internationally; however, its use within U.S. medical schools is not widely discussed in the anatomical literature. This study aimed to determine the knowledge, use, and perceptions of plastination as a teaching tool among U.S. anatomy medical educators. A total of 98 medical anatomy educators who fit inclusion criteria and teach allopathic (MD) students and/or osteopathic (DO) students in the United States completed a national survey, representing 77 medical schools across 37 states. Of these, 100% had heard of plastination, 57% correctly defined plastination, but only 39% currently utilize plastinates for anatomy education. The most frequent explanation for nonuse of plastinates was a preference for the dissection experience, followed by lack of resources and negative past experiences related to durability and quality. A majority (75%) of U.S. medical anatomy educators perceived plastination as a good supplement to, but not a replacement for, cadaveric dissection, 19% indicated no curiosity to use plastination or considered it not useful, and 14% expressed ethical concerns. These findings suggest plastinates are more widely used in the United States than reflected by the literature; however, perceptions regarding their utility indicate a dominant theme for their use to supplement, not replace, cadaveric dissection. Clin. Anat, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Medical schools in the United States continue to undergo curricular change, reorganization, and reformation as more schools transition to an integrated curriculum. Anatomy educators must find novel approaches to teach in a way that will bridge multiple disciplines. The cadaveric extraction of the central nervous system (CNS) provides an opportunity to bridge gross anatomy, neuroanatomy, and clinical neurology. In this dissection, the brain, brainstem, spinal cord, cauda equina, optic nerve/tract, and eyes are removed in one piece so that the entire CNS and its gateway to the periphery through the spinal roots can be appreciated. However, this dissection is rarely, if ever, performed likely due to time constraints, perceived difficulty, and lack of instructions. The goals of this project were (i) to provide a comprehensive, step-by-step guide for an en bloc CNS extraction and (ii) to determine effective strategies to implement this dissection/prosection within modern curricula. Optimal dissection methods were determined after comparison of various approaches/tools, which reduced dissection time from approximately 10 to 4 hours. The CNS prosections were piloted in small group sessions with two types of learners in two different settings: graduate students studied wet CNS prosections within the dissection laboratory and medical students used plastinated CNS prosections to review clinical neuroanatomy and solve lesion localization cases during their neurology clerkship. In both cases, the CNS was highly rated as a teaching tool and 98% recommended it for future students. Notably, 90% of medical students surveyed suggested that the CNS prosection be introduced prior to clinical rotations. Anat Sci Educ 11: 185-195. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.