2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Acetic Acid to Partially Replace Lactic Acid for Decontamination against Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Fresh Produce and Mechanism of Action

Abstract: Escherichia coli O157:H7 is frequently detected in ready-to-eat produce and causes serious food-borne diseases. The decontamination efficacy of lactic acid (LA) is clearly established. In this study, LA was mixed with acetic acid (AA) to reduce costs while achieving consistent or better inhibitory effects. Time-kill curves and inoculation experiments using fresh-cut spinach and arugula indicated that 0.8%LA+0.2%AA shows similar antibacterial effects to those of 1%LA. To determine whether 1%LA and 0.8%LA+0.2%AA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, ultrasonic-induced mechanical damage may deteriorate the quality of produce, leading to browning, and weight and nutrition loss. Such deterioration cannot be observed immediately after treatment; thus, quality analysis was performed at the end of storage (day 7), which is consistent with findings of previous studies [4] , [29] , [42] . The weight loss was not significantly different between the treatment and control groups ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, ultrasonic-induced mechanical damage may deteriorate the quality of produce, leading to browning, and weight and nutrition loss. Such deterioration cannot be observed immediately after treatment; thus, quality analysis was performed at the end of storage (day 7), which is consistent with findings of previous studies [4] , [29] , [42] . The weight loss was not significantly different between the treatment and control groups ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Among these combinations, the US–chlorine + 1.0 ppm AO treatment resulted in the lowest counts of E. coli O157:H7 and S. Typhimurium considering the two COD conditions; thus, the US–chlorine + 1.0 ppm AO treatment was selected for comparison with the AO-only and US–chlorine + TW treatments in terms of their abilities to damage pathogen membranes. When the cell membrane is broken, ATP, AKP, proteins, and nucleotides leak out, and the extent of this leakage reflects the degree of change in the cell membrane integrity [ [29] , [48] ]. Thus, our results indicated significantly higher ATP, AKP, proteins, and nucleotides leakage levels after US–chlorine + 1.0 ppm AO treatment than after the US–chlorine + TW treatment ( Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell membrane integrity was analyzed according to the method reported by Wang et al [ 29 ]. Sterilized TW (120 s) alone was included as a control treatment, and 1 ppm AO (120 s), US–chlorine (60 s) + TW (60 s), and US–chlorine (40 s) + 1 ppm AO (60 s) were the experimental treatments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this time-based experiment (Figure 3), rapid intrusion of propidium iodide into Gardnerella was observed but occurred more slowly with E. coli. Although the literature on lactic acid in compromising microbial membrane integrity is limited, a study on E. coli 0157:H7 showed 1% lactic acid to be effective in causing solute leakage from membranes [28]. However, based on the estimated concentration of lactic acid in a forty-fold dilution, the lactic acid would probably be insufficient by itself to induce membrane damage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%