1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4660(199709)70:1<3::aid-jctb664>3.0.co;2-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of activated carbon for the recovery of chromium from industrial wastewaters

Abstract: :A technique for the removal and recycling of hexavalent chromium from electroplating industries was developed. It involves a two-phase process which consists of (1) the use of an activated carbon bed for the accumulation of chromium onto the surface of activated carbon followed by (2) the regeneration of the carbon leading to a concentrated chromium solution with potential for reclamation or reuse within the plating operation. Results from continuous ýow experiments showed that in excess of 99% chromium remov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorption or the removal of toxic or heavy metals from aqueous effluent has been extensively studied in recent times. The use of conventional methods has been reported such as activated carbon or activated alumina (Shim, et al, 2001;Ouki, et al, 1997;Monser and Adhoum, 2002) and so on. Also, the use of the ion exchange resins and precipitation methods has been the most efficient and effective method for removing heavy metals from aqueous effluents, but these are very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorption or the removal of toxic or heavy metals from aqueous effluent has been extensively studied in recent times. The use of conventional methods has been reported such as activated carbon or activated alumina (Shim, et al, 2001;Ouki, et al, 1997;Monser and Adhoum, 2002) and so on. Also, the use of the ion exchange resins and precipitation methods has been the most efficient and effective method for removing heavy metals from aqueous effluents, but these are very expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not economically appealing because of high operational cost. Adsorption using commercial activated carbon (CAC) can remove heavy metals from wastewater, such as Cd (Ramos et al 1997); Ni (Shim et al 2001); Cr (Ouki et al 1997); Cu (Monser and Adhoum, 2002). However, CAC remains an expensive material for heavy metal removal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is non-polluting, and it can be highly selective, more efficient, easy to operate and hence cost effective. Also, adsorption using activated carbon have been reported (Ouki and Neufeld, 1997;Shim et al 2001;Monser and Adhoum, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%