1979
DOI: 10.1139/m79-174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of antisera against bovine (NCDV) and simian (SA11) rotaviruses in ELISA to detect different types of human rotavirus

Abstract: Two ELISA systems for the detection of human rotaviruses were developed. In the first system antibodies to Nebraska calf diarrhea virus (NCDV) were used for coating the solid matrix and for the preparation of the enzyme conjugate. In the second system antibodies to human rotavirus and antibodies to simian rotavirus (SA11) were used for coating the solid matrix and for the preparation of the enzyme conjugate respectively. The second ELISA system proved to have a broader spectrum for the detection of human rotav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
4
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mucus fractions were obtained from 8, the cell fractions were obtained from 6, and the original nasopharyngeal secretion was available from 3 of the 11 IF-positive specimens. All specimen fractions for the 11 IF-positive specimens were positive, and all IF-negative specimens were negative in adenovirus RIA, and the counts-per-minute values were comparable to those obtained in RSV and parainfluenza type 2 RIAs (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mucus fractions were obtained from 8, the cell fractions were obtained from 6, and the original nasopharyngeal secretion was available from 3 of the 11 IF-positive specimens. All specimen fractions for the 11 IF-positive specimens were positive, and all IF-negative specimens were negative in adenovirus RIA, and the counts-per-minute values were comparable to those obtained in RSV and parainfluenza type 2 RIAs (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Radioimmunoassay (RIA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods recently have been applied in the direct detection of viral antigens in clinical specimens (2,6,9,10,12,13). These methods offer high sensitivity and specificity, do not require any laborious pretreatment of the specimens, and allow the testing of a large number of specimens per day.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bishai et al,17 on the other hand, found several electron microscopically-positive specimens negative by EIA using NCDV antisera as immunoreagents but positive by EIA using human rotavirus and simian rotavirus (SAI 1) antisera as immunoreagents. The discrepancy between the results of Bishai et al 17 and the results of this study might be explained by the fact that they used complete virus particles for the production of immune sera whereas incomplete virus particles were used in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, with selective hyperimmune animal sera prepared against two strains of complete human rotavirus virions, i.e., virus that possessed a double capsid, two antigenically distinct human rotavirus groups, designated serotype 1 and serotype 2, were detected by CF, immune electron microscopy, and ELISA (3,(33)(34)(35). The existence of at least two human rotavirus serotypes was also demonstrated by fluorescent focus neutralization with human convalescent sera or animal hyperimmune rotavirus antisera and was also suggested by a binding ELISA with hyperimmune rotavirus antisera (1,2,6,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This property made it possible to use cultivatable animal rotaviruses as substitute antigens for detection of serological evidence of infection with the fastidious, non-cultivatable human rotaviruses (12). Later, more specific antigens were detected by neutralization of abortive foci of infection in tissue culture (fluorescent focus neutralization), hemagglutination inhibition, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) blocking and binding techniques which demonstrated that human rotaviruses differed antigenically from ani-41E mal rotaviruses and that animal rotaviruses differed from each other as well (2,22,26,32). Finally, with selective hyperimmune animal sera prepared against two strains of complete human rotavirus virions, i.e., virus that possessed a double capsid, two antigenically distinct human rotavirus groups, designated serotype 1 and serotype 2, were detected by CF, immune electron microscopy, and ELISA (3,(33)(34)(35).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%