2015
DOI: 10.3103/s0146411615030049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of arbiter physical unclonable function to solve identification problem of digital devices

Abstract: An arbiter physical unclonable function (A PUF) for solving the identification problem of digital devices is investigated. Conducted experiments by the example of a Xilinx SPARTAN 3E XC3s500e 5FG320 logic integrated circuit on a field programmable gate array (FPGA) are described.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the experimental analysis found the uniqueness (~47%), randomness (79%) and steadiness (82%).to enhance the reliability P. Klybik and A. A. Ivaniuk [27] designed a 128-stage arbiter PUF architecture in Spartan 3E -XC3s500e and estimated the reliability (91%) and uniqueness (48%).…”
Section: Delay Based Arbiter Based Pufsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the experimental analysis found the uniqueness (~47%), randomness (79%) and steadiness (82%).to enhance the reliability P. Klybik and A. A. Ivaniuk [27] designed a 128-stage arbiter PUF architecture in Spartan 3E -XC3s500e and estimated the reliability (91%) and uniqueness (48%).…”
Section: Delay Based Arbiter Based Pufsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique can result in unbalanced responses and increased overhead of detecting and recoding meta-stabilization states. More arbiters can also be added to reduce the number of utilizable challenges and improve the reliability of the response at the expense of the hardware overhead [18]. In addition, the outputs of multiple arbiters are correlated, which can compromise the unpredictability of the response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique may lead to unbalanced response digits as well as detection and recoding overheads of metastable states. More arbiters can also be added to decrease the number of utilizable challenges and increase the reliability of the response at the expenses of hardware overhead [24]. Besides, the outputs of multiple arbiters are correlated, which may compromise the response unpredictability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%