“…The scientic challenge in practice with this framework has been the proper parametrisation of 1) the training load [40,55,654,883]; 2) the recovery state and preparedness to train [322,394,537]; 3) injury risk prediction [356,357,601,755,881]. Out of these three goals, training load and recovery state are within practical reach at current technological maturity level, whereas injury prediction seems overly challenging [315,356,357,385,386,599,678] 1 , mainly due to inherent low prevalence of injuries in athletic population [101,105,344,377,397,627,686,743,878], which subsequently leads to injury prediction models with poor predictive power [348,504].…”