1998
DOI: 10.1080/03680770.1995.11900918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of biological assessment criteria in the evaluation of a high mountain stream, the Rio Hondo, New Mexico, USA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 10 metrics included abundance (population size); taxa richness (number of taxa); Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) richness (number of EPT taxa); EPT/EPT + Chironomidae ratio (a high ratio indicates a good biotic condition); community loss (the lower the value the more similarity exists between the two locations); percent dominant taxa; taxa diversity (Shannon-Weaver); Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) (0 -3.5 = excellent, 3.5 -4.5 = very good, 4.5 -5.5 = good,… 8.5 -10 = very poor water quality); scrapers/scrapers + filtering collector ratio (indicates the food base present; a low ratio indicates the abundance of filamentous algae); and shredders/total functional feeder ratio (gives an indication of the coarse particulate organic material present; a low ratio indicates a poor riparian environment). The relationship (percent similarity) of these metrics as they relate to the upstream reference site was used to calculate an overall biological condition score [32], which is compared with the following four designations: nonimpaired (>83% similar community attributes), slightly impaired (54% -79%), moderately impaired (21% -49%), and severely impaired (<19%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 10 metrics included abundance (population size); taxa richness (number of taxa); Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) richness (number of EPT taxa); EPT/EPT + Chironomidae ratio (a high ratio indicates a good biotic condition); community loss (the lower the value the more similarity exists between the two locations); percent dominant taxa; taxa diversity (Shannon-Weaver); Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) (0 -3.5 = excellent, 3.5 -4.5 = very good, 4.5 -5.5 = good,… 8.5 -10 = very poor water quality); scrapers/scrapers + filtering collector ratio (indicates the food base present; a low ratio indicates the abundance of filamentous algae); and shredders/total functional feeder ratio (gives an indication of the coarse particulate organic material present; a low ratio indicates a poor riparian environment). The relationship (percent similarity) of these metrics as they relate to the upstream reference site was used to calculate an overall biological condition score [32], which is compared with the following four designations: nonimpaired (>83% similar community attributes), slightly impaired (54% -79%), moderately impaired (21% -49%), and severely impaired (<19%).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%