1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf01002426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of commercially available monoclonal antibodies for immunoenzyme double staining

Abstract: An immunoenzyme double-staining method for the simultaneous detection of two cellular epitopes, using commercially available mouse monoclonal antibodies, is described. The method employs a combination of the suppression of endogenous biotin and two successive indirect techniques with a blocking step in between. The first indirect method involves an unlabelled monoclonal antibody followed by an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin. After a blocking step with normal mouse serum, the sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic concept for the immunoenzyme double staining techniques has been described previously [25,26]. Its detailed performance was dependent on the combination of the primary antibodies.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic concept for the immunoenzyme double staining techniques has been described previously [25,26]. Its detailed performance was dependent on the combination of the primary antibodies.…”
Section: Immunohistochemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkalinephosphalase activity was detected with Napthol AS-MX, fast red violet sail and levamisole added sequentially to veronal acetate buffer (Boorsma, 1984). Horseradish peroxidase activity was detected according to van der Loos et al, (1988) using disodium sulphur succinatc. trimethyl benzidine, citrate-phosphate buffer and pcrhydrol.…”
Section: Double Stainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…naphthol-AS-MX phosphate in combination with Fast Blue or Fast Red) showed a lower sensitivity than the NBT/ BCIP detection method (De Jong et al, 1985). (2) Detecting HRP activity as a red precipitate with aminoethylcarbazole or a green precipitate with tetramethylbenzidine shows a sensitivity comparable with the use of DAB, but the red precipitate dissolves in ethanol and the green reaction product is not heat resistant ( Van der Loos et al, 1988), both conditions essential to the in situ DNA-hybridization protocol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%