Use Of Community-Based Participatory Communication to Identify Community Values at a Superfund Site

Anyaegbunam, Chike; Hoover, Anna; Schwartz, Mitchael

doi:10.1061/41114(371)44

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous tools and approaches can help optimize stakeholder engagement activities. Community-based participatory communication [70], collaborative and participatory modeling [71], community-based participatory research [72,73], and the convergence-building model of environmental health communication [74] all describe group processes for Education leaders can select and adapt the engagement strategies that work best for their settings and populations. Third-party knowledge from industrial hygienists, public health officials, engineers, and other technical experts can help balance power dynamics within these collaborative spaces while also increasing environmental health literacy among participants.…”

Section: Modulating Effectiveness Of Controls: Stakeholder Identificamentioning

confidence: 99%

Balancing incomplete COVID-19 evidence and local priorities: risk communication and stakeholder engagement strategies for school re-opening

Hoover

Heiger-Bernays

Ojha

et al. 2020

Reviews on Environmental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, United States (U.S.) educational institutions must weigh incomplete scientific evidence to inform decisions about how best to re-open schools without sacrificing public health. While many communities face surging case numbers, others are experiencing case plateaus or even decreasing numbers. Simultaneously, some U.S. school systems face immense infrastructure challenges and resource constraints, while others are better positioned to resume face-to-face instruction. In this review, we first examine potential engineering controls to reduce SARS-CoV-2 exposures; we then present processes whereby local decision-makers can identify and partner with scientists, faculty, students, parents, public health officials, and others to determine the controls most appropriate for their communities. While no solution completely eliminates risks of SARS-CoV-2 exposure and illness, this mini-review discusses engaged decision and communication processes that incorporate current scientific knowledge, school district constraints, local tolerance for health risk, and community priorities to help guide schools in selecting and implementing re-opening strategies that are acceptable, feasible, and context-specific.

show abstract

Section: Modulating Effectiveness Of Controls: Stakeholder Identificamentioning

confidence: 99%

Balancing incomplete COVID-19 evidence and local priorities: risk communication and stakeholder engagement strategies for school re-opening

Hoover

Heiger-Bernays

Ojha

et al. 2020

Reviews on Environmental Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The initial phase of the project involves extensive interviews and focus group interactions. These activities are designed to help ensure identification of which groups are impacted and in what ways, and how their value systems and positionality vis-à-vis the PGDP conditions their perspectives on the various facets of the future vision question (Anyaegbunam, Hoover, and Schwartz, 2010;Ormsbee and Hoover, 2010).…”

Section: A Framework Of Fairness=justice: Structured Public Involvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…2006) Similarly, in the case of PGDP, it is important that we are able to focus on the considerations that are of the most import to the public. That is part of the goal of the focus group and interview process (Anyaegbunam, Hoover & Schwartz, 2010).…”

Section: Decision Support Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of Structured Public Involvement to Identify Community Preferences for a Superfund Site End State Vision

Grossardt

Ripy

Bailey

2010

World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…As researchers across the social sciences dissect the ethical and moral implications of various approaches to fieldwork (de Laine, 2000; Zeni, 2001), participatory approaches have arisen that support collaborative decisions throughout the research process and resonate with participant values and perspectives (Anyaegbunam, Hoover, & Schwartz, 2010; Beltran, 1993; Brown, Howes, Hussein, Longley, & Swindell, 2002; Israel, Schulz, Parker, & Becker, 1998). While addressing ethical concerns and empowering non-academic participants, these approaches also provide vital ways of identifying real-world barriers and benefits for interventions (Graybill et al, 2010), addressing land-use and natural resource challenges (Ormsbee & Hoover, 2014; Smucker, Campbell, Olson, & Wangui, 2007), and optimizing the public health impact of research findings (Vanderpool, Brownson, Mays, Crosby, & Wyatt, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With real-world relevance and translatability as important goals, applied methodological approaches have arisen along the participatory continuum that value context and empower stakeholders to partner actively with academics throughout the research process. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) provides the gold standard for equitable, partnered research in traditional communities. Practice-based research networks (PBRNs) also have developed, coalescing communities of practice and of academics to identify, study, and answer practice-relevant questions. To optimize PBRN potential for expanding scientific knowledge, while bridging divides across knowledge production, dissemination, and implementation, we elucidate how PBRN partnerships can be strengthened by applying CBPR principles to build and maintain research collaboratives that empower practice partners. Examining the applicability of CBPR partnership principles to public health (PH) PBRNs, we conclude that PH-PBRNs can serve as authentic, sustainable CBPR partnerships, ensuring the co-production of new knowledge, while also improving and expanding the implementation and impact of research findings in real-world settings.Keywords practice-based research networks (PBRN), community-based participatory research (CBPR), academic-practice partnerships, communities of practice, knowledge co-production

show abstract

Use Of Community-Based Participatory Communication to Identify Community Values at a Superfund Site

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

Balancing incomplete COVID-19 evidence and local priorities: risk communication and stakeholder engagement strategies for school re-opening

Balancing incomplete COVID-19 evidence and local priorities: risk communication and stakeholder engagement strategies for school re-opening

Use of Structured Public Involvement to Identify Community Preferences for a Superfund Site End State Vision

Applying Community-Based Participatory Research Partnership Principles to Public Health Practice-Based Research Networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About