1967
DOI: 10.1093/jee/60.5.1228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Daphnia magna for the Microbioassay of Pesticides. I. Development of Standardized Techniques for Rearing Daphnia and Preparation of Dosage-Mortality Curves for Pesticides1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature IC 50 s for acute toxicity of pp'DDT on D. magna (Table II) (Frear and Boyd, 1967;Randall et al, 1979) are in good agreement with this result, bearing in mind that the literature data refer to the nominal concentration and that a certain variability is usually observed between Daphnia strains cultured in different laboratories (Baird et al, 1990). An even higher variability, however, is to be expected in pp'DDT sensitivity at the inter-specific level: the sensitivity of D. pulex to pp'DDT was much higher than that of the two other Daphnia species (Table II).…”
Section: Zooplanktonsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Literature IC 50 s for acute toxicity of pp'DDT on D. magna (Table II) (Frear and Boyd, 1967;Randall et al, 1979) are in good agreement with this result, bearing in mind that the literature data refer to the nominal concentration and that a certain variability is usually observed between Daphnia strains cultured in different laboratories (Baird et al, 1990). An even higher variability, however, is to be expected in pp'DDT sensitivity at the inter-specific level: the sensitivity of D. pulex to pp'DDT was much higher than that of the two other Daphnia species (Table II).…”
Section: Zooplanktonsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In the present study, the lowest reported effect level for a certain taxonomic group is used. Data were obtained from open literature and technical reports containing validated toxicological data [17–26]. Priority was given to reviewed sources of data sets, as a thorough evaluation of the quality of data in primary sources was beyond the scope of this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of exposure of animals to toxicants has a profound effect on the percentage of the population responding, and thus it affects the sensitivity and in many cases the practicality of ISSN 2157-6076 2015 the method (Frear and Boyd, 1967). However, the time of exposure used in Daphnia bioassays varies largely from one method to another.…”
Section: Newman and Mccloskey (1996)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the American Standard Methods (APHA, 1975) recommend an exposure time of 48 h, while the Japanese Standard Methods (Hashimoto and Nishiucbi, 1981) recommend 3 hr only. On the other hand, Frear and Boyd (1967) used a-26 h exposure period, while Parker et al (1970) used 30 min only. In this respect, we have previously suggested that shorter exposure periods (e.g.…”
Section: Newman and Mccloskey (1996)mentioning
confidence: 99%