2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucie.2020.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of diffusion tensor imaging to assess the vasogenic edema in traumatic pericontusional tissue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these measure deviation from Gaussian diffusion and probability of net zero displacement respectively (Avram et al, 2016 ; Özarslan et al, 2013 ), decreases in both these measures indicate prior concussion was associated with more free diffusion in gray matter. Although we cannot definitively link current findings to any specific underlying pathology, this pattern of results is generally consistent with less restricted diffusion that could be caused by pathological changes documented as a result of mTBI, such as reduced dendritic density, vasogenic edema, or increased perivascular spaces (Johnson et al, 2013 ; Kane et al, 2011 ; Lara et al, 2021 ; Sepehrband et al, 2019 ; Spain et al, 2010 ; Winston et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since these measure deviation from Gaussian diffusion and probability of net zero displacement respectively (Avram et al, 2016 ; Özarslan et al, 2013 ), decreases in both these measures indicate prior concussion was associated with more free diffusion in gray matter. Although we cannot definitively link current findings to any specific underlying pathology, this pattern of results is generally consistent with less restricted diffusion that could be caused by pathological changes documented as a result of mTBI, such as reduced dendritic density, vasogenic edema, or increased perivascular spaces (Johnson et al, 2013 ; Kane et al, 2011 ; Lara et al, 2021 ; Sepehrband et al, 2019 ; Spain et al, 2010 ; Winston et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%