2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2009.10.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy to image poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) microgel particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior was reproducible and consistent on both “extruded” and “embedded” versions of the sensor, fabricated via negative (Hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ)) and positive (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) tone resists respectively with e-beam lithography (Figure 5A and 5B). Consistent with prior studies of PNIPAM PNPs by SEM, 36,37,38 dried particles imaged under the negligible humidity conditions of the SEM instrument appear to be widely spaced apart; as we describe above, hydrated particle films were effective at preventing antibody immobilization to these surfaces. While the particles employed in these experiments are too small for us to observe via optical microscopy, an analogously prepared film of larger particles assembled around nanoscale features and observed at ambient laboratory humidity shows that they indeed pack closely (supplementary information), consistent with the blocking ability of particle films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This behavior was reproducible and consistent on both “extruded” and “embedded” versions of the sensor, fabricated via negative (Hydrogen silsesquioxane (HSQ)) and positive (Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA)) tone resists respectively with e-beam lithography (Figure 5A and 5B). Consistent with prior studies of PNIPAM PNPs by SEM, 36,37,38 dried particles imaged under the negligible humidity conditions of the SEM instrument appear to be widely spaced apart; as we describe above, hydrated particle films were effective at preventing antibody immobilization to these surfaces. While the particles employed in these experiments are too small for us to observe via optical microscopy, an analogously prepared film of larger particles assembled around nanoscale features and observed at ambient laboratory humidity shows that they indeed pack closely (supplementary information), consistent with the blocking ability of particle films.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…To observe a phase separation, the terpolymer AM‐NaAA‐DNDA was dissolved in the degassed and distilled water as a solution (wt% = 300 mg/L) 26, 27. The scanning electron microscope images were made by S‐3000 N SEM (Hitachi, Japan).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To observe a phase separation, the terpolymer AM-NaAA-DNDA was dissolved in the degassed and distilled water as a solution (wt% ¼ 300 mg/L). 26,27 The scanning electron microscope images were made by S-3000 N SEM (Hitachi, Japan). The resolution of the SEM was 3 lm, and the magnifying multiple ranges from 3 to 30,000 and analysis was achieved at 20 kV of acceleration voltage and 120-500 Pa of pressure in the sample chamber.…”
Section: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (Esem) Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to observe the films with higher resolution, environmental scanning electron microscopy (eSEM) was performed on the silicon substrate after film deposition. This technique permits SEM measurements in finite humidity and pressure, p . In Figure f, a monolayer of PNIPAM particles can be clearly seen with neck‐like connections between many neighboring particles, which we identify as interparticle cross‐links.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%