2021
DOI: 10.22541/au.161860163.36232122/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Evidence in Acute Stroke Decision-Making: Implications for Evidence-Based Medicine

Abstract: Evidence-Based Medicine proposes a prescriptive model of physician decision-making in which “best evidence” is used to guide best practice. And yet, proponents of EBM acknowledge that EBM fails to offer a systematic theory of physician decision-making. In this paper, we explore how physicians from the neurology and emergency medicine communities have responded to an evolving body of evidence surrounding the acute treatment of patients with ischemic stroke. Through analysis of this case study, we argue that EBM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors raise pertinent and challenging questions concerning our understanding of the nature of health and disease, 23 , 24 diagnosis and the processes of clinical decision making. 25 , 26 These contributions are followed by several highly original articles addressing the relationship between evidence and practice in medicine and healthcare, 27 , 28 , 29 demonstrating the application of specific, philosophically informed approaches to causal reasoning with reference to some very practical contemporary health controversies. 30 , 31 Continuing debates on pressing issues we have emphasized in more recent thematic editions, authors explain and analyse different conceptions of ‘patient‐centred care’ and ‘patient expertise’, 32 , 33 discussing the role of values in shaping our understanding of the mental and medical disorder, 34 , 35 and the relationship between epistemic risk and nonepistemic values in the end of life care.…”
Section: Philosophy and The Clinic: Stigma Respect And Shamementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors raise pertinent and challenging questions concerning our understanding of the nature of health and disease, 23 , 24 diagnosis and the processes of clinical decision making. 25 , 26 These contributions are followed by several highly original articles addressing the relationship between evidence and practice in medicine and healthcare, 27 , 28 , 29 demonstrating the application of specific, philosophically informed approaches to causal reasoning with reference to some very practical contemporary health controversies. 30 , 31 Continuing debates on pressing issues we have emphasized in more recent thematic editions, authors explain and analyse different conceptions of ‘patient‐centred care’ and ‘patient expertise’, 32 , 33 discussing the role of values in shaping our understanding of the mental and medical disorder, 34 , 35 and the relationship between epistemic risk and nonepistemic values in the end of life care.…”
Section: Philosophy and The Clinic: Stigma Respect And Shamementioning
confidence: 99%