2011
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e328340e730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of FDG-PET/CT for peritoneal carcinomatosis before hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

Abstract: PET presented a good performance level in the diagnosis and evaluation of the extent of PC. PET/CT examinations could be useful to avoid unnecessary surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
16
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Metabolic imaging with FDG-PET/CT has already proved its usefulness in the management of patients with digestive cancer [9]. However, there are only limited data available on the value of these techniques in assessing PC staging [6,7,[10][11][12]. Moreover, to our knowledge, intraindividual head-to-head comparison of both FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI has, to date, not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic imaging with FDG-PET/CT has already proved its usefulness in the management of patients with digestive cancer [9]. However, there are only limited data available on the value of these techniques in assessing PC staging [6,7,[10][11][12]. Moreover, to our knowledge, intraindividual head-to-head comparison of both FDG-PET/CT and MR-DWI has, to date, not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All imaging modalities have limitations when it comes to diagnosing PC, but PET-CT appears to be the most sensitive. 4 Diagnosis is more frequently and accurately found during laparoscopy or laparotomy. 1 Treatment of PC remains controversial and generally limited or palliative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the promising results in the preoperative assessment of PC, F-18-FDG PET/CT seems to be an optimal technique to evaluate patients after HIPEC as it is at least comparable if not better than other imaging modalities in the preoperative setting [12]. One aspect in favor of PET/CT is its ability to assess tissue metabolism thus helping to differentiate between malignant tumor and postoperative scar in patients in whom morphologic assessment alone is insufficient [30]. Based on our results, PET/CT seems to perform well also in the follow-up after HIPEC with an overall diagnostic accuracy of 91 % for the detection of PC on a patient basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%