2000
DOI: 10.1002/1098-2728(2000)12:3<142::aid-lra5>3.0.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of flow injection analysis for continuous monitoring of river water quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Svendsen et al, 1995;Jarvie et al, 1998), gaining acceptable representation of temporal variability requires understanding of the bias and precision of different sampling strategies, particularly the frequency of sampling (Kronvang and Bruhn, 1996;Stevens and Smith, 1978;Walling and Webb, 1982). New developments in continuous monitors (Wiryawan, 2000;Hanrahan et al, 2001) offer improved means of sampling short-term variations in P concentrations. The variability in water quality in a river cross-section is also often significant because of incomplete mixing of upstream tributary or pointsource inputs and groundwater seepage.…”
Section: Sampling : Collecting a Representative Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Svendsen et al, 1995;Jarvie et al, 1998), gaining acceptable representation of temporal variability requires understanding of the bias and precision of different sampling strategies, particularly the frequency of sampling (Kronvang and Bruhn, 1996;Stevens and Smith, 1978;Walling and Webb, 1982). New developments in continuous monitors (Wiryawan, 2000;Hanrahan et al, 2001) offer improved means of sampling short-term variations in P concentrations. The variability in water quality in a river cross-section is also often significant because of incomplete mixing of upstream tributary or pointsource inputs and groundwater seepage.…”
Section: Sampling : Collecting a Representative Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…35,36 The parameters that can be determined are nitrite, nitrate, ammonia, phosphate, silica, arsenic, and mercury.…”
Section: Automatic Fia Systems For Water Quality Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the development of field instrumentation capable of providing continuous, real-time, analytical data with good temporal resolution would provide a valuable contribution to the process of characterising water quality [12] and improve our understanding of the biogeochemistry of phosphorus in freshwater systems. [9,13] Flow injection (FI) analysis, which has the characteristics of ease of operation, good precision, and high sample throughput, has been coupled with spectrophotometric detection to monitor FRP in natural waters (e.g., Refs. 6,7,9,14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%