2006
DOI: 10.1079/ivp2006776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of hi ii-elite inbred hybrids in Agrobacterium-based transformation of maize

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model species Arabidopsis thaliana can be easily transformed via the oral dip method with Agrobacteria delivery of genetic material, a process which can generate stable transgenic seed within 3-5 weeks [12]. In contrast, maize transformation methods are more laborious and time consuming, taking up to 6 months after the transformation event to generate transgenic seed [13][14][15][16][17] . Typically, immature embryo-derived callus tissue is transformed either by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of transgenes and both processes have a transformation rate e ciency of about 12-30% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model species Arabidopsis thaliana can be easily transformed via the oral dip method with Agrobacteria delivery of genetic material, a process which can generate stable transgenic seed within 3-5 weeks [12]. In contrast, maize transformation methods are more laborious and time consuming, taking up to 6 months after the transformation event to generate transgenic seed [13][14][15][16][17] . Typically, immature embryo-derived callus tissue is transformed either by particle bombardment or Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of transgenes and both processes have a transformation rate e ciency of about 12-30% [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genomic Lr34res construct under the wheat native promoter and terminator in the binary vector p6U ( p6U:gLr34res ; Risk et al ., ) was transformed into the maize Hi‐II (A188 x B73) hybrid (Horn et al ., ) using Agrobacterium tumefaciens ‐mediated transformation according to a protocol previously established (Hensel et al ., ; Van der Linde et al ., ). Fifty‐five T0‐plants were recovered and the identification of the Lr34res transformants was done by PCR on genomic DNA using the cssfr1 marker (Lagudah et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were combined with log phase A. tumefaciens EHA101 containing the cellulase vectors. Samples were vortexed, sonicated for 30 s (Trick and Finer 1997) and placed on solidified co-cultivation medium plates containing MS salts and MS vitamins, as described by Horn et al (2006). Plates were incubated for 3, 4, or 5 d at 18°C in the dark.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%