2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00297.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of high‐frequency ultrasound in the assessment of injectable dermal fillers

Abstract: Background: The use of dermal fillers for enhancing lips and reducing wrinkles is currently one of the fastest growing sectors of the cosmetic surgery market. There are numerous fillers available, some are synthetic others are isolated from biological material. Once injected the fillers have a varied lifespan ranging from months to years depending upon the material, site of injection and individual response. Current assessment techniques of filler performance are mostly limited to evaluations of the skin surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ultrasonography may be a useful tool to evaluate the surface topography of the skin and to assess what may happen to the filler beneath the surface of the skin [22, 23]. Ultrasonography was used to ascertain the site, quantity and type of filler that should be injected into the soft tissue of the face in a cohort of 80 subjects who underwent facial filler augmentation [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasonography may be a useful tool to evaluate the surface topography of the skin and to assess what may happen to the filler beneath the surface of the skin [22, 23]. Ultrasonography was used to ascertain the site, quantity and type of filler that should be injected into the soft tissue of the face in a cohort of 80 subjects who underwent facial filler augmentation [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High frequency diagnostic ultrasound (HFDU) is a non‐invasive method, which allows the clinician to get a high‐resolution image of the wound and surrounding tissue (12–15). This simple procedure can often be used without removing the dressing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The major difference between the two is that bacteria-fermented low-concentration HA is fermented from bacteria, while animal-derived low-concentration HA is purified from rooster combs. 16,17 Rabbit ears and porcine models have been used to study the persistence of cross-linked collagen and the effects of laser treatment on HA filler implants, respectively, 18,19 but rigorous preclinical testing of resorption rates with quantitative analysis of filler volume over time have not been reported. 13 These two NASHA fillers use 1, 4 butanediol diglycidyl ether (BDDE) as a cross-linker, with very high-concentration NASHA produced as a homogenous gel with 20% more HA than high-concentration NASHA's gel particles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%