Use of improved inputs and its effect on maize yield and profit in Uganda

Abstract

Maize is an important crop, produced by nearly all households in Uganda. Yet, the yield of the crop is low, mainly blamed on low use of improved technologies. In a bid to understand why farmers are reluctant to adopt modern agricultural technologies, which are hailed for enhancing productivity, this study assessed the effect of improved inputs use on maize yield and profit in Uganda. The analysis was based on the Uganda National Household Survey data of 2005/06. A graphical analysis was used to assess the yield and profit outcomes associated with use of improved seed and fertiliser. Stochastic production functions of yield and profit were estimated to assess the effect of use of improved inputs on yield and profit. Graphical results indicated that maize producers who applied fertiliser on improved seed obtained the highest yield but lower gross profit margin while farmers who never applied fertiliser on improved seed obtained lower yield but the highest gross profit margin. Regression results indicated that higher expenditure on fertiliser and traction per hectare had a significant (p<0.05) positive effect on yield. No significant effect on gross profit margin was however observed in the case of higher expenditure on fertiliser and traction per hectare in maize production. Results indicate that whereas expansion in area cultivated had a significantly (p<0.01) negative effect on yield, it was the most important (p<0.01) means of increasing profit. Education level and access to extension services are key farmer characteristics that were found to have a significantly (p<0.01) positive influence on the profit and yet no remarkable influence on yield. Notable was that maize producers that were members in the government extension agency, National Agricultural Advisory Services organization, (NAADS) had lower yield than farmers not in NAADS. These results suggest that NAADS and other agencies that are involved in promoting use of modern agricultural technologies in Uganda have an uphill task of proving and hence persuading farmers that use of these technologies not only enhances yield but also increases farm profits.

Smallholder Maize Farmers Need Better Storage for Food Security: An Exploratory Study over the Storage Types Used in Uganda

“…It is the most popular contributor to income and food for smallholder farmers and for institutions like the police, the army, prisons, schools, and hospitals. Thus, maize act as the main source of food for such institutions and contributes over 11% of the caloric intake [4][5][6]. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), maize forms an important part of the staple food supplies [3,7].…”

A New Value Proposition for Uganda’s Maize Stover to Manufacture Moulded Pulp Packaging Material for Fruits and Vegetables

“…Smallholders account for 80% of the rural poor in Uganda, but are also the major producers of maize. Maize is grown in every part of the country [8] and provides a direct source of income for over two million households, over 100,000 traders, and 600 millers [9]. Increasingly, maize has become a major non-traditional export cash crop particularly benefitting smallholder farmers and is therefore extremely important to many households for both food security and income www.rsisinternational.org Page 2 [8].…”

Short-term trade-offs of organic matter management strategies for smallholder farms

“…Agriculture in Uganda, where 95 percent of the farmers are smallholders with landholdings averaging two hectares, is characterized by low land productivity (Njeru et al, 2016). Taking an example of maize, which is one of the most important crops grown for food and sale in Uganda (Agona et al, 2001), its productivity in terms of grain yield has been recorded at 1.5 tons/ha compared to the potential of 7 tons/ha (Okoboi et al, 2012;Simtowe et al, 2019). One of the major factors contributing to these low crop yields is the lack of adequate nutrients for crops resulting from soil nutrient depletion (Tadele, 2017), low recirculation of animal manure, low share of legumes, lack of crop residue (straw) management, and low mineral fertilizer application regimes (Odhiambo and Mag, 2008).…”