2010
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-201007272-01717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Isoniazid Chemoprophylaxis in Renal Transplant Recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1), of which six were nonrandomized or observational studies ( Table 2). One of these RCTs was reported twice, once in 2006 (21) and again in 2009 (22), in an analysis of the same patients but with a longer follow-up, albeit with slightly discrepant numbers. One of these RCTs was reported twice, once in 2006 (21) and again in 2009 (22), in an analysis of the same patients but with a longer follow-up, albeit with slightly discrepant numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1), of which six were nonrandomized or observational studies ( Table 2). One of these RCTs was reported twice, once in 2006 (21) and again in 2009 (22), in an analysis of the same patients but with a longer follow-up, albeit with slightly discrepant numbers. One of these RCTs was reported twice, once in 2006 (21) and again in 2009 (22), in an analysis of the same patients but with a longer follow-up, albeit with slightly discrepant numbers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five reports of four RCTs conducted from 1994 to 2009 were reviewed ( Table 4). After contacting the authors, we have used the later article (22) with the longer follow-up in our analysis. After contacting the authors, we have used the later article (22) with the longer follow-up in our analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported by others, the use of "universal" isoniazid prophylaxis in living-related kidney transplantation in an endemic area resulted in reduced numbers of active tuberculosis after transplantation. [20][21][22] WHO estimates the incidence rates of tuberculosis in Saudi Arabia to be 14 per 100 000 in 2013 (range, 12-16 per 100 000). 13 The prevalence of LTBI (defined as TST reaction of ≥10 mm) in the general population was reported in a nationwide survey in 1993 to be 33% in people without prior BCG vaccination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit of INH prophylaxis in reducing incidence of post transplant TB in KTRs of TB -endemic region, over the risk of development of drug resistant TB with INH montherapy exposure is unclear. Despite proven protective efficacy in clinical trials in endemic countries such as India and Pakistan [39][40][41], INH primary prophylaxis is often not practiced due to fear of inducing primary INH resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the risk of INH hepatotoxicity. The incidence of drug resistance to INH and/or Rifampicin could be as high as 20% among Indian KTR with TB [42].…”
Section: Mycobacterium Tuberculosismentioning
confidence: 99%