2012
DOI: 10.5751/ace-00521-070201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Large Clear-Cuts by Wilson’s Warbler in an Eastern Canadian Boreal Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Probabilistic text generation often leads to outputs that, while linguistically coherent, may lack factual accuracy, thereby undermining the reliability of LLMs in applications demanding high precision [15], [16]. Various factors, including the diversity and quality of training datasets, significantly impact the frequency and severity of hallucinations, suggesting a need for more balanced and comprehensive training data [17], [18]. Experiments demonstrated that models tend to hallucinate more when dealing with incomplete or ambiguous prompts, indicating that input clarity is crucial for minimizing erroneous outputs [19], [20].…”
Section: B Hallucinations In Llmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probabilistic text generation often leads to outputs that, while linguistically coherent, may lack factual accuracy, thereby undermining the reliability of LLMs in applications demanding high precision [15], [16]. Various factors, including the diversity and quality of training datasets, significantly impact the frequency and severity of hallucinations, suggesting a need for more balanced and comprehensive training data [17], [18]. Experiments demonstrated that models tend to hallucinate more when dealing with incomplete or ambiguous prompts, indicating that input clarity is crucial for minimizing erroneous outputs [19], [20].…”
Section: B Hallucinations In Llmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another technique involved the use of external knowledge bases, integrating factual data into the generation process to provide context and reduce the likelihood of hallucinations [8], [9]. Adversarial training, where models were exposed to misleading inputs, helped to improve robustness by teaching LLMs to identify and correct potential hallucinations [10]- [12]. Multi-task learning was applied, enabling models to simultaneously learn from various related tasks, thereby improving their generalization capabilities and reducing errors [13], [14].…”
Section: Literature Review Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benchmarks set through specific tasks and datasets enabled consistent comparisons across different LLMs [12]- [14]. Experimental setups often included variations in prompt engineering to elicit more accurate and contextually appropriate responses from the models [15]- [17]. Quantitative metrics such as perplexity, BLEU scores, and ROUGE scores were commonly employed to evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in generating coherent and contextually relevant text [18]- [20].…”
Section: A Evaluations Of Large Language Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%