2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of low-level laser therapy to reduce postoperative pain, edema, and trismus following third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Domah et al [44] and Duarte de Oliveira at al. [45] found that LLLT has a positive outcome in the reduction of postoperative swelling after mandibular third molar surgery. In contrast to the findings of our study, López-Ramírez et al [46] and Pedreira et al [47] have failed to show a beneficial effect of laser on swelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a systematic review and meta-analysis, Domah et al [44] and Duarte de Oliveira at al. [45] found that LLLT has a positive outcome in the reduction of postoperative swelling after mandibular third molar surgery. In contrast to the findings of our study, López-Ramírez et al [46] and Pedreira et al [47] have failed to show a beneficial effect of laser on swelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to our results, Singh et al [41] found no significant effects of laser on trismus. In addition, in their systematic review and meta-analysis, Domah et al [44] Duarte de Oliveira et al [45], didn't found any significant effects of laser on the maximum mouth opening after third molar surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Six studies [ 7 , 12 , 13 , 27 , 30 , 32 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the study selection process (due to lack of specified databases' searched strategy or potential risk of selection of RCTs by only one reviewer instead of 2≤ independent reviewers). Seven studies [ 10 ]; [ 27 , 29 , 32 , 35 , 36 , 39 ] had a high risk of bias regarding the data collection step (according to unclear efforts made to minimize errors in data collection and quality assessment). In terms of synthesis, 9 studies [ 10 ]; [ 8 , 11 , 27 ]; [ 13 , 30 , 35 37 ] showed a high risk of bias (due to lack of appropriate interpretation and justification of the observed high heterogeneity or due to lack of sensitivity analysis where possible) ( Figure 2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the lower overlap of Brignardello-Petersen et al's study [ 33 ] with other meta-analyses and outdated search strategies compared to Dawdy et al‘s, Dawdy et al's study [ 34 ] was selected for the main analysis. Domah et al's [ 35 ] and de Oliveira et al's [ 36 ] studies were excluded from the analyses due to their high risk of bias. Among two remaining meta-analyses [ 6 , 37 ] with moderate risk of bias and high overlap, the study conducted by de Barros et al [ 13 ] was included in the sensitivity analysis due to the inclusion of more recent RCTs compared with Dawdy et al's study (Figures 5 and 6 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLLT acts like an anaesthetic agent that temporally disrupts the cytoskeleton. The exact mechanism for this effect is unknown, but it has been shown that LLLT promote vasodilatation, enhance blood flow, lymph drainage and fibroblast and neutrophil activation, which results in changes in the pain threshold [14]. The modulation of neurotransmitters is another possible mechanism of pain relief, as serotonin and endorphin levels have been shown to increase following laser treatment of myofascial pain in patients [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%