2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of misoprostol on an outpatient basis for postdate pregnancy

Abstract: In the prevention of postdate pregnancy, outpatients use of oral misoprostol 50 microg appears to result in earlier delivery, as compared to 25 microg.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Kipikasa et al compared the efficacy of two different oral misoprostol doses given to patients with postdates pregnancies in an ambulatory setting. 9 Subjects were randomized to receive either misoprostol 50 or 25 mg every 3 days for a total of three doses. They found that patients given 50 mg of misoprostol delivered significantly earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Kipikasa et al compared the efficacy of two different oral misoprostol doses given to patients with postdates pregnancies in an ambulatory setting. 9 Subjects were randomized to receive either misoprostol 50 or 25 mg every 3 days for a total of three doses. They found that patients given 50 mg of misoprostol delivered significantly earlier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, the overall time from first medication dose to delivery was significantly shortened in the treatment vs. placebo group. In a dosing study, Kipikasa et al 31 compared outpatient dosing regimens of 25 mcg vs. 50 mcg given every 3 days as an outpatient to a total of 49 patients. The mean interval to delivery from start of cervical ripening was 2.4 days in the 50mcg group and 3.9 days in the 25 mcg group (p o 0.05).…”
Section: Outpatient Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No commitment to delivery within a given time or protocol Katz 1983 Alternate allocation trial. Kipikasa 2005 Comparing alternate methods for induction of labour. Klopper 1969 Trial of cervical ripening not IOL.…”
Section: Iqbal 2004mentioning
confidence: 99%