2021
DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmch.2021.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of molecular docking computational tools in drug discovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
176
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 320 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 238 publications
0
176
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the research phase for phytochemicals with activity against S. mutans, carried out in the present study, no specific research was carried out for the classes of phytoconstituents. However, surprisingly, all isolated and identified chemical structures (24 compounds) belonged to the class of phenolic compounds, more specifically the class of flavonoids (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,24) and isoflavonoid derivatives (1, 10, 11, and 22). Five phytocompounds evaluated were elected as one of the three best ligands for at least three target proteins, highlighting the following compounds: 11 (erystagallin) (highlighted for 6 targets), 10 (erycristagallin) (highlighted for 5 targets), 1 (methoxyficifonilol) (highlighted for 4 targets), 20 (malvidin-3,5-diglucoside), and 2 (sophoraflavanone G), which provided indications of a possible and desirable multi-target action of these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the research phase for phytochemicals with activity against S. mutans, carried out in the present study, no specific research was carried out for the classes of phytoconstituents. However, surprisingly, all isolated and identified chemical structures (24 compounds) belonged to the class of phenolic compounds, more specifically the class of flavonoids (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,23,24) and isoflavonoid derivatives (1, 10, 11, and 22). Five phytocompounds evaluated were elected as one of the three best ligands for at least three target proteins, highlighting the following compounds: 11 (erystagallin) (highlighted for 6 targets), 10 (erycristagallin) (highlighted for 5 targets), 1 (methoxyficifonilol) (highlighted for 4 targets), 20 (malvidin-3,5-diglucoside), and 2 (sophoraflavanone G), which provided indications of a possible and desirable multi-target action of these compounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the evolution of bioinformatics, biotechnology, and molecular biology, including the determination of protein structures by using X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, it has become increasingly easier to use in silico tools to predict functioning drugs. Thus, in the last 20 years, more than 60 different molecular docking software were developed by universities and companies [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method effectively makes up for the inadequacy of traditional methods and can obtain detailed results quickly. To date, the interaction between proteins and small molecules by molecular docking has been widely used in food [ 22 ], bioengineering [ 23 ], medicine and other industries [ 24 ], and molecular docking technology has made great progress [ 25 ]. The evaluation of the results of docking prediction mainly analyzes the RMSD value of the docking compound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, two targets, such as β1- and β2-AR, were considered for molecular docking with PubChem compounds using ADV [ 70 ]. ADV is a freely available open-source molecular docking tool and has been highly cited since its availability from 2010 [ 74 ]. ADV is an excellent choice as a widely used docking tool to determine accurate and rapid binding affinity prediction between the protein and ligand [ 75 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%