2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of multiple indicators to compare sustainability performance of organic vs conventional vineyard management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surface area and time of year dictate the number of management operations in the row, the inter-row or both, such as the use of herbicides or mechanical tillage for weeding and the control of plant growth by mowing or rolling. Furthermore, the winegrowers preference for a service plant strategy is also related to grape yield objectives (according to wine label regulations); to the level of technical knowledge (Marques et al, 2015) ; to the use of inputs such as pesticides (Mailly et al, 2017), fertilizers, water, fuel and labortime (Borsato et al, 2020); and to the associated services targeted by the winegrower (Mercenaro et al, 2014).…”
Section: What Are the Management Strategies Of Winegrowers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface area and time of year dictate the number of management operations in the row, the inter-row or both, such as the use of herbicides or mechanical tillage for weeding and the control of plant growth by mowing or rolling. Furthermore, the winegrowers preference for a service plant strategy is also related to grape yield objectives (according to wine label regulations); to the level of technical knowledge (Marques et al, 2015) ; to the use of inputs such as pesticides (Mailly et al, 2017), fertilizers, water, fuel and labortime (Borsato et al, 2020); and to the associated services targeted by the winegrower (Mercenaro et al, 2014).…”
Section: What Are the Management Strategies Of Winegrowers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There also exists a vast array of studies about the environmental and social impact of wine production: special interest has been dedicated to the water footprint of wine [20,21] and the comparative studies on the carbon footprint of wine [22][23][24][25]. Furthermore, the use of multiple indicators has been proposed to compare the environmental burdens of conventional and organic vineyard management [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This FU was selected to properly understand the contribution of many variables on the total impacts, deriving from different agricultural practices on the same land extension, coherently with the LCA's purpose. Aware that the productivity of an organic vineyard may be lower than that of a conventional one, in this study a production of + 20% per hectare was assigned to the conventional vineyard (Scenario C), as reported in literature (Malusà et al 2004;Borsato et al 2020). This is the lowest yield value obtained from an organic crop compared to the conventional one (the reported mean is 10-11%) and here it is used to consider the worst possible scenario for organic practices, in order to give more robustness to the results of the analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%