2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-95894-9_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Mycorrhiza Bioassays in Ecological Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bioassays for AM fungi have many limitations, such as time of soil sampling, previous crop, fallow period, and P status of the soil (Djuuna et al 2009). Even though the bioassay results showed increased microbial activity, mycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth, and P nutrition when biochar was applied in the field with mineral or low level of soluble fertiliser, it is necessary to carry out several bioassays in different times throughout the cropping season to fully assess the interactions among biochar, fertilisers, farming systems, and microbes in WA soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bioassays for AM fungi have many limitations, such as time of soil sampling, previous crop, fallow period, and P status of the soil (Djuuna et al 2009). Even though the bioassay results showed increased microbial activity, mycorrhizal colonisation, plant growth, and P nutrition when biochar was applied in the field with mineral or low level of soluble fertiliser, it is necessary to carry out several bioassays in different times throughout the cropping season to fully assess the interactions among biochar, fertilisers, farming systems, and microbes in WA soils.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the bioassay environment may differ from the field conditions. Djuuna et al (2009) explained that Bioassays have the potential to assist in predicting how roots might become colonized in field soils, but calibrations are necessary. The number of spores in this study (2-20 spores/10 gram of soil) are slightly higher than those reported by Suharno et al (2016), which ranged from 8 to 12 spores/10 gram of soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Murphy et al (2007) reported that the performance of microbial inoculants in the field can be inconsistent. Measurement of mycorrhizal colonization of roots is usually used in bioassays with commercial products, but calibrations that take into account an understanding of the relationships between mycorrhizal colonization and soil conditions are necessary (Djuuna et al 2009). Consistency of plant responsiveness to inoculation with selected strains of AM fungi should be a prerequisite to adoption of AM inoculation practices.…”
Section: Analysis Of Biofertilizers With Am Fungal Used In Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%