2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-2671(11)52240-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Nutritional Information in Canada: National trends between 2004 and 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is probably because they consider themselves vulnerable to certain age-related diseases or are already managing such diseases and are therefore more conscious of their food intake. This finding is in line with the reports of Satia, Galanko and Neuhouser (2005) and Drichoutis et al (2006) and Goodman et al (2011) that older people use food product information more than younger consumers. However, it contradicts the findings of Onay et al (2011) who reported that younger consumers paid more attention to food product information than older consumers.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This is probably because they consider themselves vulnerable to certain age-related diseases or are already managing such diseases and are therefore more conscious of their food intake. This finding is in line with the reports of Satia, Galanko and Neuhouser (2005) and Drichoutis et al (2006) and Goodman et al (2011) that older people use food product information more than younger consumers. However, it contradicts the findings of Onay et al (2011) who reported that younger consumers paid more attention to food product information than older consumers.…”
Section: Discussion Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, causes for the negative shifts in products purchased with star ratings in the baking and spices; condiments and sauces; and health foods categories are less clear. For the baking and spices, and condiments and sauces categories, earlier evidence suggests consumers seldom search for nutrition evidence on pleasure foods, as they are more concerned about taste than the healthfulness of these products and believe that healthier foods do not taste as good . Therefore, it is possible that consumers associated higher star ratings with poor taste and avoided purchasing these products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a real-life setting, the consumer has to choose among several alternatives which include-as was already mentioned-published sources, media sources, experts, and social sources. Indeed, recent studies indicate that friends, family, social networking sites, television, radio, Web sources, booklets, newspapers, magazines, and experts (de Almeida et al, 1997;Fan & Li, 2010;Freisling, Haas, & Elmadfa, 2010;Goodman, Hammond, Pillo-Blocka, Glanville, & Jenkins, 2011;Heuberger & Ivanitskaya, 2011;Kitamura, 2013;Kornelis, De Jonge, Frewer, & Dagevos, 2007;Lappalainen, Kearney, & Gibney, 1998;Lee, Niode, Simonne, & Bruhn, 2012;Watson & Wyness, 2013) are some of the most commonly used food information sources. However, in the case of food information, the consumer can also seek information through three more categories of sources: store personnel, i.e., retailers (Verbeke, Vermeir, & Brunsø, 2007) or salespeople (Marshall, 2004); institutional sources, i.e., governmental agencies and consumer organizations (Frewer, Howard, Hedderley, & Shepherd, 1996;Hiddink, Hautvast, Van Woerkum, Fieren, & Van't Hof, 1997;Ippolito, 1999); and food labels (Jacobs, de Beer, & Larney, 2011;Nayga, Lipinski, & Savur, 1998).…”
Section: Information-seeking Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%