2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4878(00)00043-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of patches and whole body sampling for the assessment of dermal exposure

Abstract: There has been a growing awareness of the importance of dermal exposure in recent years. A wide range of techniques are employed to measure exposure, of which surrogate skin techniques such as patch sampling and whole body sampling are frequently used. One of the problems associated with dermal sampling is that different methods often produce different results due to differences in the principles involved in sample collection. As a consequence little progress towards establishing dermal exposure limits has bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
11

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Several approaches have been taken to assess dermal exposure (Fenske, 1993;van Hemmen and Brouwer, 1995). Direct methods consist in the quantification of the amount of pesticides on the workers' skin or clothing, using patches or the whole body technique (Soutar et al, 2000). Hand exposure is assessed by handwashing or with the use of cotton gloves (OECD).…”
Section: Sampling Strategy In Operators and Backpack Sprayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been taken to assess dermal exposure (Fenske, 1993;van Hemmen and Brouwer, 1995). Direct methods consist in the quantification of the amount of pesticides on the workers' skin or clothing, using patches or the whole body technique (Soutar et al, 2000). Hand exposure is assessed by handwashing or with the use of cotton gloves (OECD).…”
Section: Sampling Strategy In Operators and Backpack Sprayersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is at least questionable whether accurate quantitative estimates can be derived for the dermal route with current measurement methods. [For an overview of dermal exposure assessment techniques see Brouwer et al (7), Cherrie et al (8), and Soutar et al (9).] Therefore, an integrated estimate of the internal dose cannot, in many cases, be derived easily.…”
Section: Exposure Metrics and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the patch method for evaluation of the dermal exposure was already discussed in literature (Soutar et al, 2000). The main disadvantage is considered to be a possible over or under estimation of the real exposure because the placing of the patches can not compensate the heterogeneity of the pesticide deposits on the particular body part.…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%