1985
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1017341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Placebos in Medical Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Six studies did not address definitional issues in the publication and probably in the questionnaire but five of these clearly focused on pure placebos [ 18 - 21 , 31 ], while some of the questions in one survey also addressed impure placebos [ 27 ]. Nine studies included explicit definitions or explanations in questionnaires or interviews for clarification [ 23 , 28 - 30 , 32 , 34 - 37 ]. One of these explicitly asked participants not to proceed with the questionnaire if they disagreed with the definition [ 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six studies did not address definitional issues in the publication and probably in the questionnaire but five of these clearly focused on pure placebos [ 18 - 21 , 31 ], while some of the questions in one survey also addressed impure placebos [ 27 ]. Nine studies included explicit definitions or explanations in questionnaires or interviews for clarification [ 23 , 28 - 30 , 32 , 34 - 37 ]. One of these explicitly asked participants not to proceed with the questionnaire if they disagreed with the definition [ 30 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of use of placebo intervention reported in this study was also among the highest yet reported, but not the very highest. In the group that was asked explicitly about the use of placebo interventions, 60% of respondents declared at least monthly use, whereas in American studies, the corresponding rates were 80% (Tilburt et al, 2008) and 8% (Sherman & Hickner, 2008), and in German studies, 70% (Classen & Feingold, 1985) and 13% (Bernateck et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent review, Fässler, Meissner, Schneider, and Linde (2010) identified 23 publications that presented the results of research aimed at defining the scope and frequency of placebo interventions by physicians and nurses, and also—much more rarely—by medical interns, medical students, and patients, as well as the circumstances that surrounded and attitudes toward such interventions (Berger, 1999; Bernateck et al, 2009; Berthelot, Maugars, Abgrall, & Prost, 2001; Chen & Johnson, 2009; Classen & Feingold, 1985; Comaroff, 1976; Ernst & Abbot, 1997; Fässler, Gnädinger, Rosemann, & Biller-Andorno, 2009; Goldberg, Leigh, & Quinlan, 1979; Goodwin, Goodwin, & Vogel, 1979; Gray & Flynn, 1981; Hróbjartsson & Norup, 2003; Lange, 1981; Lim & Seet, 2007; Lynöe, Mattsson, & Sandlund, 1993; Nitzan & Lichtenberg, 2004; Saupe, 1986; Schwartz, Soumerai, & Avorn, 1989; Shapiro & Struening, 1973a, 1973b; Sherman & Hickner, 2008; Thomson & Buchanan, 1982; Tilburt, Emanuel, Kaptchuk, Curlin, & Miller, 2008). These reports prove that placebo interventions are indeed used in clinical practice; however, the data on the frequency of their use are highly variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Offizinell gibt keine Bezugsquellen für Placebos, wo bekommt man sie eigentlich her? In der Praxis werden Pseudoplacebos bevorzugt, das sind Präparate, die definierte Inhaltsstoffe enthalten, für die es aber keinen Wirkungsnachweis gibt [14]. Das Placebo-Problem ist eine Art Refugium für diejenigen Bereiche der Heilkunde geworden, für die sich kein von den handelnden Individuen unabhängiges therapeutisches Agens oder Prinzip hat empirisch stabilisieren lassen.…”
Section: Ist Denn Aufklärung Alles?unclassified