Abstract:Significant advances have been made recently in applying probabilistic methods to aerospace vehicle concepts.Given the explosive changes that are occurring in today's political, social, and technological climate, it makes practical sense to try and extrapolate these methods to the campaign analysis level. This would allow the assessment of rapidly changing threat environments as well as technological advancements, aiding today's decision makers. The following paper summarizes attempts to apply these methods di… Show more
“…ASDL does exactly this in many of their papers; "the aircraft is sized according to the primary mission and subsequently 'flown' on the secondary mission to record the fallout performance" [Soban and Mavris, 2001]. Therefore, this analysis will do exactly the same.…”
Section: The Role Of Mission Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such a framework is well suited for RSM analysis "because there is a clear analysis path from the campaign code all the way back to the [DP level], transparency is enhanced and a proper assessment may be conducted" [Soban and Mavris, 2001]. By integrating the ITEM program with the response surface methodology, the ASDL was able to map system level MOPs to mission level MOEs.…”
“…Such a framework is well suited for RSM analysis "because there is a clear analysis path from the campaign code all the way back to the [DP level], [thus] transparency is enhanced and a proper assessment may be conducted" [Soban and Mavris, 2001].…”
Section: The Role Of Mission Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the human decision maker can be modeled. [Soban and Mavris, 2001] Finaly, this research provided only one-third of the total UTE framework. The next significant step will be to integrate the work from this thesis with technology insertion analysis as done by [Psallidas, 2003] and design analysis similar to [Goggins, 2001].…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning
This research develops a new framework for performing military effectiveness analyses and design tradeoff decisions. It provides an extensive survey of literature for effectiveness analysis and multi-criteria decision making to develop a single consistent philosophy for such analyses.This philosophy is applied to a requirements and effectiveness analysis case study of a conventional submarine that is performed using Response Surface Methods to facilitate design space visualization and decision maker interaction. Measures of Merit are developed and applied to the case study. The resulting requirements space and methods to visualize and explore it in a decision making context are presented and discussed Lastly, a framework is proposed that would facilitate the concurrent consideration of requirements and effectiveness analyses with design and technology forecasting to create a Unified Tradeoff Environment that would provide decision makers with pertinent information to facilitate better informed requirements derivation and design selection.
“…ASDL does exactly this in many of their papers; "the aircraft is sized according to the primary mission and subsequently 'flown' on the secondary mission to record the fallout performance" [Soban and Mavris, 2001]. Therefore, this analysis will do exactly the same.…”
Section: The Role Of Mission Analysismentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Such a framework is well suited for RSM analysis "because there is a clear analysis path from the campaign code all the way back to the [DP level], transparency is enhanced and a proper assessment may be conducted" [Soban and Mavris, 2001]. By integrating the ITEM program with the response surface methodology, the ASDL was able to map system level MOPs to mission level MOEs.…”
“…Such a framework is well suited for RSM analysis "because there is a clear analysis path from the campaign code all the way back to the [DP level], [thus] transparency is enhanced and a proper assessment may be conducted" [Soban and Mavris, 2001].…”
Section: The Role Of Mission Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the human decision maker can be modeled. [Soban and Mavris, 2001] Finaly, this research provided only one-third of the total UTE framework. The next significant step will be to integrate the work from this thesis with technology insertion analysis as done by [Psallidas, 2003] and design analysis similar to [Goggins, 2001].…”
Section: Recommendations For Future Workmentioning
This research develops a new framework for performing military effectiveness analyses and design tradeoff decisions. It provides an extensive survey of literature for effectiveness analysis and multi-criteria decision making to develop a single consistent philosophy for such analyses.This philosophy is applied to a requirements and effectiveness analysis case study of a conventional submarine that is performed using Response Surface Methods to facilitate design space visualization and decision maker interaction. Measures of Merit are developed and applied to the case study. The resulting requirements space and methods to visualize and explore it in a decision making context are presented and discussed Lastly, a framework is proposed that would facilitate the concurrent consideration of requirements and effectiveness analyses with design and technology forecasting to create a Unified Tradeoff Environment that would provide decision makers with pertinent information to facilitate better informed requirements derivation and design selection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.