2015
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of PIT tags to assess individual heterogeneity of laboratory‐reared juveniles of the endangered Cumberlandian combshell (Epioblasma brevidens) in a mark–recapture study

Abstract: The federally endangered Cumberlandian combshell (Epioblasma brevidens) was propagated and reared to taggable size (5–10 mm), and released to the Powell River, Tennessee, to augment a relict population. Methodology using passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags on these mussels greatly facilitated the detection process. The overall mean detection probability and survival rate of released individuals reached 97.8 to 98.4% and 99.7 to 99.9% (per month), respectively, during nine successive recapture occasions i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the use of PIT tags requires more handling time than other methods, such as plastic tags or glitter glue, because most epoxies need 12 h to cure completely. Future projects affixing PIT tag with epoxy or cement should consider faster-drying brands (e.g., Fuji Glass Ionomer Luting Cement recommended by Hua et al 2015) to reduce holding time. We do not feel the mass of the epoxied PIT tag caused stress given the sizes of mussels (mean size was 115 mm for A. ligamentina and 103 mm for L. cardium) and the minimal amount of epoxy used for the 12.5 mm tags.…”
Section: Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the use of PIT tags requires more handling time than other methods, such as plastic tags or glitter glue, because most epoxies need 12 h to cure completely. Future projects affixing PIT tag with epoxy or cement should consider faster-drying brands (e.g., Fuji Glass Ionomer Luting Cement recommended by Hua et al 2015) to reduce holding time. We do not feel the mass of the epoxied PIT tag caused stress given the sizes of mussels (mean size was 115 mm for A. ligamentina and 103 mm for L. cardium) and the minimal amount of epoxy used for the 12.5 mm tags.…”
Section: Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rearing larger-sized (>20 mm) juvenile mussels for release is an important first step to restore imperiled populations. Mark-recapture techniques using PIT tags helps to ensure the success of evaluating mussel restoration efforts (Hua et al 2015). Hence our study, covering the critical stages of juvenile propagation, culture, and release to monitoring provided a demonstration of conservation and restoration of an endangered mussel species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various reintroduction methodologies have been attempted; translocation of adult mussels from large populations is the most cost-effective method for reestablishing historical populations, though density of available source populations is a limiting factor for most species (Carey et al 2015). Researchers have refined culture methods for juveniles, allowing greater sizes for release and improved survival rates (Hua et al 2015).…”
Section: Conservation and Population Restoration Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%