2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Span 80 and Tween 80 for blending gasoline and alcohol in spark ignition engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most important features that gives information about the type of small molecule emulsifiers and the respective emulsions they stabilize is known as the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB), which is the balance between the size and strength of the two components of the emulsifier, i.e., hydrophilic and lipophilic components. HLB values have mainly been explored for small molecule surfactants , but have also found application in the case of amphiphilic macromolecules . For small molecules, emulsifiers with HLB values greater than 10 favor o/w emulsions and HLB values below 10 favor w/o emulsions, such that the HLB values of the emulsifier can be used to determine the type of emulsion formed. , Commonly used amphiphilic small molecule emulsifiers such as sodium lauryl sulfate (HLB = 40), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (HLB = 10.6), alkyl phenyl polyoxyethylene ether (HLB = 14.5), and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (HLB = 15) lead to the formation of o/w emulsions. , In contrast, Span 80 (sorbitan monooleate, HLB = 4.9), glyceryl monostearate (HLB = 3.8), and Span 65 (sorbitan tristearate, HLB = 2.1) favor w/o emulsions. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most important features that gives information about the type of small molecule emulsifiers and the respective emulsions they stabilize is known as the hydrophilic–lipophilic balance (HLB), which is the balance between the size and strength of the two components of the emulsifier, i.e., hydrophilic and lipophilic components. HLB values have mainly been explored for small molecule surfactants , but have also found application in the case of amphiphilic macromolecules . For small molecules, emulsifiers with HLB values greater than 10 favor o/w emulsions and HLB values below 10 favor w/o emulsions, such that the HLB values of the emulsifier can be used to determine the type of emulsion formed. , Commonly used amphiphilic small molecule emulsifiers such as sodium lauryl sulfate (HLB = 40), sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate (HLB = 10.6), alkyl phenyl polyoxyethylene ether (HLB = 14.5), and polyoxyethylene sorbitan monooleate (HLB = 15) lead to the formation of o/w emulsions. , In contrast, Span 80 (sorbitan monooleate, HLB = 4.9), glyceryl monostearate (HLB = 3.8), and Span 65 (sorbitan tristearate, HLB = 2.1) favor w/o emulsions. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result has to be ascribed to the specific Span 80 features. Its low HLB value of 4.3 [ 35 ] along with its high solubility in organic solvents makes it suitable for W/O inverted emulsion stabilization. Presenting a relatively small size, it rapidly diffuses at the interface creating a compact superficial coating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…also demonstrated that although nonionic SAAs do not ionize into charged molecules, they can be adsorbed onto the surface charge of the water molecules at the particle/water interface, forming an electric double layer that is similar to the one formed with ionic SAAs (Han et al., 2008 ). In addition, the lower ZP values observed with PF127 can be attributed to its high hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) value (22) (Seth & Katti, 2012 ) when compared to T80 (HLB value = 15) (Kassem et al., 2019 ). Ibrahim et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%