2022
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of spray nozzles to recover dissolved methane from an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket (UASB) reactor effluent

Abstract: Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas and a source of energy. Recovering this gas means lower greenhouse gas emission and potential reduction of energetic costs. The lack of full-scale results, the use of different methodologies to detect dissolved methane (d-CH4) and the fact that no process to remove d-CH4 from anaerobic effluents is energetically or economically viable at full-scale urged a different approach to the problem. To avoid methodological interference and facilitate comparison of results the Standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other options for removing dissolved methane from effluents include oxidation of the effluent stream in a special reactor, the use of appropriately constructed biofilters or a downflow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor, or stripping and vacuuming. However, these are also associated with large energy inputs and low efficiency [136][137][138]. An interesting alternative for the removal of methane from wastewater streams may be hydraulic spray nozzles, which have demonstrated an efficiency of approximately 82% in removing methane from wastewater streams [136].…”
Section: Summary Of the Pre-treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other options for removing dissolved methane from effluents include oxidation of the effluent stream in a special reactor, the use of appropriately constructed biofilters or a downflow hanging sponge (DHS) reactor, or stripping and vacuuming. However, these are also associated with large energy inputs and low efficiency [136][137][138]. An interesting alternative for the removal of methane from wastewater streams may be hydraulic spray nozzles, which have demonstrated an efficiency of approximately 82% in removing methane from wastewater streams [136].…”
Section: Summary Of the Pre-treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these are also associated with large energy inputs and low efficiency [136][137][138]. An interesting alternative for the removal of methane from wastewater streams may be hydraulic spray nozzles, which have demonstrated an efficiency of approximately 82% in removing methane from wastewater streams [136]. This does not change the fact that there is no universal solution.…”
Section: Summary Of the Pre-treatment Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%